ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Poor Wi-Fi drivers can expose laptops

Peter Judge ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 23 Jun 2006 18:00 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Two leading security researchers have warned that Wi-Fi equipment developed without due care can be inherently insecure allowing hackers to use flaws in device drivers to take control of laptops.

David Maynor of Internet Security Systems and Jon Ellch, a student at the US Naval postgraduate school in Monterey, plan to demonstrate the problem by seizing control of a laptop through its wireless device driver at the Black Hat USA 2006 conference in Las Vegas next month.

Wireless device drivers are developed without proper attention to security, and new features are rushed in for competitive reasons, so the code is often buggy and insecure, the pair claim.

Tools are now readily available to take advantage of the vulnerabilities. One tool, lorcon (loss of radio connectivity) , created by Joshua Wright, security architect at Aruba Networks, and Michael Kershaw, can overload wireless LAN cards with 802.11 frames in multiple driver frameworks, a technique known as "fuzzing". If the packets cause the driver to fail, then the hacker stands a chance of running unauthorised code.

The attack can be mounted by sitting in a public space and waiting for a machine to come within range. Even if it is not connected to a WLAN, it can be attacked through the low-level "sniffing" that most network cards carry out, looking for WLANs to attach to.

"Wireless device drivers are like the Wild, Wild West right now," Maynor told Infoworld. "LORCON has really brought mass Wi-Fi packet injection to script kiddies. Now it's pretty much to the point where anyone can do it."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
106 out of 179 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

Microelectronics Software Manager, Network Mgt Software/ Open Fabrics

Drivers, Libraries & Open Fabrics Software management experience is essential for this role (likely to be more than 5 years) and experience of ...

Campaign Analyst SAS - Brighton or London up to 37k

SAS, SAS Base, SAS Macro, SQL, Business Objects, computer software literate, Relational database, statistical, statistic, data analysis, ...

Senior Embedded Software Engineer East Midlands

Primary responsibilities will be developing VxWorks BSPs and VxWorks device drivers. You will be proficient in the use of C and have in-depth ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation