ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Police will not pursue ransom hackers

Tom Espiner ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 02 Jun 2006 12:50 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Greater Manchester Police (GMP) will not be pursuing the criminals who used a Trojan horse program to lock a Manchester woman's files and demanded a ransom to release them.

The malicious Archiveus program was unintentionally downloaded by Helen Barrow of Rochdale, who found it locked her files into a 30-character password-protected folder. A ransom note instructed her to avoid going to the police, and buy pharmaceutical products online to gain the password to release her files.

Barrow did not pay, and managed to recover some data. The police, however, will not be investigating the crime.

"We aren't investigating the incident as it's an Internet crime, and not within the GMP area — technically it's international," a spokeswoman for GMP told ZDNet UK.

"Trying to find who did this it would be a monumental task," a spokeswoman for GMP told Out-Law.com.

No other police force appears to be investigating the incident either. "We are not aware of any ongoing investigations," the GMP spokeswoman said.

Legal experts questioned the wisdom of sending a message to hackers that they would not be chased for commmitting Internet crime.

"To say it's difficult to trace a hacker is a dangerous message for the GMP to send," said Struan Robertson, senior associate at solicitors Pinsent Masons. "It's unrealistic for police to investigate every single incidence of hacking, but their response in this case is disappointing," Robertson said.

Senior ex-police officers and security experts are understood to be concerned that cases of this kind will not be investigated as they fall outside the remit of both local police forces and international crime agencies.

Cases such as the Archiveus incident would previously have been dealt with by the National High Tech Crime Unit (NHTCU), which was amalgamated into the Serious and Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) in April.

"This is the kind of attack that presumably would have been within the NHTCU's remit," said Robertson. "There is a risk that people will perceive crimes of this kind as falling outside the remit of SOCA, because they do not appear to be the work of organised criminals."

SOCA refused to comment on whether this case falls within its remit, and could give no suggestion as to whether this incident is actually being investigated by any police unit at all.

"If it falls within our remit, we will investigate. E-crime is a concern of SOCA, but we can't comment on individual cases. SOCA doesn't comment on ongoing or possible investigations at all," a SOCA spokesman told ZDNet UK.

Cambridge University security expert Richard Clayton pointed out that the police simply aren't in a position to handle every reported crime, but also warned that some cybercrime offences — including international cybercrime committed by individuals — may be a priority for neither local officers nor SOCA.

"Firstly, it is not realistic to expect the police to investigate every crime — we all know that from personal experience, if our house has been burgled or our car broken into," said Clayton.

"The second issue is the demarcation issue that is occurring, hopefully temporarily, in the UK whereby local police with local targets to achieve do not have any resources or incentive to investigate out-of-area criminality. However, the national force is concentrating on 'organised' crime, and so if the crime looks like a one-off, committed by an individual, then even if they might be able to track them down, they may not be interested either," Clayton said.

Antivirus companies have now cracked the Archiveus Trojan, and determined that the password used to unlock data is "mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw".

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
118 out of 224 people found this useful


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:



Related Jobs

Capgemini - Careers in Consulting, Technology and Outsourcing

You can expect challenge and variety when you find yourself at the centre of transformation projects for clients like HMRC, the Metropolitan Police, ...

Websphere Developer - Message Broker/MQ Series - West Midlands

Java / Websphere / Message Broker / SOAP / Webservices. They are specifically looking for a background using Websphere Message Broker (WMB) as well ...

Application Support Analyst

You will have practical experience in: -B2B messaging systems -Root cause analysis -Dealing with customers -Following procedures -In working in a ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation