ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

ID cards 'taking focus away from e-crime'

Dan Ilet silicon.com

Published: 25 Apr 2006 15:50 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The government is ploughing too many resources into the ID cards scheme while failing to fight e-crime, a member of the House of Lords has claimed.

Lord Erroll today said plans to roll out ID cards in the UK have been promoted by the government as a way of fighting crime, but he questioned their validity.

During a keynote speech at the Infosecurity conference in London, Erroll said: "ID is very much on the political agenda. E-crime is not so much. Why not?

"You consider the millions [of pounds] to sort out ID cards. I could do a lot more with that. ID is seen as a way of stopping crime — a quick solution. But I question whether that is true. People think it's used to keep you safe.

"We can be much more subtle about this. The thing that no one is talking about is electronic ID. That's sad."

Erroll said central government is planning to use ID cards as a way of controlling the population, whereas local governments are looking at the range of services they can provide, such as healthcare.

He also questioned the technology — such as biometrics — that the government is planning to implement for identity control, saying one in 200 DNA matches is incorrect. He added that the police required more resources for labour-intensive computer forensics work.

He said: "The problem is when you have all the technology. All of these things are not perfect. The Home Office worries about policing but there is a huge drought of forensic research resources and that can take up an awful lot of police time."

Erroll doubted whether the formation of the Serious Organised Crime Agency would solve government's e-crime fighting problems.

He said: "I'm not sure the right way to deal with it is by setting up new agencies with new powers. If those powers are used wisely, I would still like to see some sort of democratic accountability secured."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
93 out of 180 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

Project Manager - Smart Card technologies, Acesss, Identity management

The programme consists of numerous projects bringing technology of 'smart cards' into the day to day of the business. The projects will include: ...

S55189: Security/Quality Analyst

Accountability / Responsibility: Security - Drive and monitor the security compliance within the organisation. This will require ensuring security ...

NIGHT 1st Line Security Engineer - 20-22K Maidstone

The right person will be a good communicator, with the ability to problem solve and take control of a situation. Training and career progression are ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation