ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

E-crime laws failing, say top experts

Tom Espiner ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 12 Apr 2006 17:15 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Leading government figures and senior law enforcement officers think cybercrime legislation is ineffectual and unenforceable, according to a report published on Wednesday by Websense, a security vendor.

The survey of 112 security professionals and law enforcers found that three-quarters of them believe current legislation isn't capable of dealing with e-crime against businesses and consumers.

"They felt legislation lacked teeth both nationally and internationally, and that there was a lack of enforcement through the courts," said Mark Murtagh, European technical director for Websense.

In the UK, experts have long argued that the existing Computer Misuse Act is inadequate, and needs to be updated. In January, the government finally agreed to modernise the act.

Police also felt they did not have enough resources to deal with cybercrime issues, and that they was a lack of cooperation across jurisdictions. Websense welcomed the creation of the Serious and Organised Crime Agency (Soca) as fostering international cybercrime-fighting cooperation.

"This is where Soca will help," said Murtagh. "The National Crime Squad and the National Hi-Tech Crime Unit, the National Criminal Intelligence Service, HMRC and the UK Immigration Service are now all working together in Soca to make a significant impact on e-crime.

However, some experts have warned that Soca won't have the resources to fight cybercrime effectively.The survey was conducted at the E-Crime Congress 2006, held in London in March.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
114 out of 208 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

SAP ABAP CONSULTANT URGENTLY URGENTLY URGENTLY REQUIRED!!!

You should make yourself aware of how immigration laws apply to your situation before applying for any jobs. Huntress does not discriminate on the ...

Change manager

You should make yourself aware of how immigration laws apply to your situation before applying for any jobs. Huntress does not discriminate on the ...

Environmental, Health and Safety Manager role- 45,000

As Environmental, Health and Safety Manager for the site you will be required to have a proven track record in a senior Health and Safety role in an ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation