ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Debit card breach mystery deepens

Greg Sandoval CNET News.com

Published: 13 Feb 2006 09:50 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

An investigation into thousands of compromised debit cards that was widely reported last week appears to involve two of largest retailers in the US, according to multiple law enforcement and banking sources.

This week, two major banks joined a credit union in cancelling a combined 200,000 accounts belonging to debit-card holders. In letters to affected customers, Bank of America and Washington Mutual said they were cancelling debit cards because of a security breach at a "third-party" location. Officials from both banks and law enforcement agencies have refused to identify the location.

Sources now say that the case might involve two separate retail chains — one which has acknowledged a problem and another whose possible role is uncertain.

After receiving a call from ZDNet UK sister site CNET News.com about the investigation into the 200,000 cancelled credit cards, a Wal-Mart media representative refused to answer questions but called attention to a statement released by the company on 2 December, 2005. In the statement, Wal-Mart acknowledged that credit cards used by some customers who bought petrol at the company's Sam's Club stations between 21 September, 2005, and October 2, 2005, were compromised. Many Sam's Clubs also accept debit cards.

There are more than 500 Sam's Clubs in the United States, according to information on Walmart.com, but it is unclear how many sell petrol. The December statement also did not say whether the security breach was restricted to any region.

"The investigation began when the credit card issuers reported that some cardholders were reporting fraudulent charges on their statements," Wal-Mart said in its press release. "It is still in its preliminary stages, with no determination on how the data was improperly obtained."

Wal-Mart also said it had reported the case to the US Attorney's Office and the Secret Service.

But the trail doesn't end with Wal-Mart, said sources close to the investigation. As investigators began to look into the recent rash of unauthorised charges, they found that a large number of people whose debit cards were compromised had one thing in common: they previously had shopped at office-supply chain OfficeMax, said a banking source familiar with the case. Two law enforcement sources also said OfficeMax is part of the investigation but did not provide details.

None of the sources, who requested anonymity due to the ongoing investigation, knew for certain whether OfficeMax had suffered a security breach.

"We have not suffered any security breach to our knowledge," OfficeMax said on Friday.

According to one banking official close to the case, OfficeMax has been queried by at least one financial institution about the matter.

"This is why we don't reveal the names to the public," said the banking official who requested anonymity. "We're not sure which customers may have been ripped off in the Wal-Mart deal or whether OfficeMax was the problem."

The case is being investigated by the FBI and Secret Service, said FBI special agent John Cauthen, who works out of the bureau's Sacramento office. Cauthen declined to comment on Wal-Mart or OfficeMax.

Cauthen said Friday the FBI is working on a debit-card fraud case that was first reported by The Sacramento Bee  last November. In that case, the Golden 1 Credit Union cancelled about 1,500 debit cards after being alerted to possible fraud in the Sacramento area.

The credit union told customers that the fraud resulted in "counterfeit cards being made and used internationally". Golden 1 told the Bee that it closed accounts after discovering unauthorised withdrawals at ATMs in the UK, Russia and South Korea. Golden 1 also said that not all the debit cards cancelled had unauthorised withdrawals on them, but all were used at an unidentified Sacramento business in the fall of 2005.

Someone working for that merchant is suspected of pilfering account and personal identity numbers from the cards, the Bee reported.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
58 out of 99 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. Does this affect anyone in the UK who has shopped... Anonymous

Related Jobs

Fraud Analyst

West Midlands based Retail Bank are currently recruiting for a Fraud Analyst to join their expanding team. The successful individual will be ...

Fraud Portfolio Manager - Midlands

Working as a Portfolio Manager in a Fraud Policy team you will be responsible for Fraud Strategy Definition, 3rd party Fraud Performance Tracking ...

Project Manager - Accounts

Computer Futures Solutions are urgently seeking a Project Manger to head up the Accounts Workstream of a major Financial Services provider on the ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation