ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Bank of America's security compromised

Greg Sandoval CNET News.com

Published: 10 Feb 2006 09:20 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A security breach involving an undisclosed company has prompted Bank of America to cancel the debit cards of numerous customers, a spokesman for America's largest bank said on Tuesday.

The bank refused to release the name of the company involved, the exact number of customers affected or whether the company in question was online or a traditional brick-and-mortar establishment.

The case is unusual in that debit cards appeared to be at risk. Credit cards are typically involved in security breaches at financial institutions because they are used more often than debit cards for retail transactions.

"These are intricate matters... and may involve information that is not exactly clear and concise," according to the bank. "It would be premature to discuss any third parties until an investigation is conducted."

The bank said that to this point, there is no evidence that any of its customer accounts have been compromised. The move to cancel debit cards was a precaution, he said.

An investigation is under way, the bank said, but it added that it was unaware of what law enforcement agency was overseeing it.

Bank of America issued letters to many customers notifying them of the breach and that their debit cards were no longer good. The bank is also telling customers to watch out for any unauthorised transactions on their statements.

"As a proactive security-minded effort, we may take steps to replace people's cards," Chee said. "We know this can represent a minor inconvenience. The question is, would we rather risk inconveniencing customers and protect their information and accounts, or do we just do nothing?"

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
114 out of 278 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. There are some updates to this story. It appears... ted richardson

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

European Sales - Credit data

European Sales - Credit data My client is an innovative vendor who provides financial institutions world-wide with a suite of credit data products. ...

Oracle DBA- Central belt 40k + 4K car allowance

In today's market this is an outstanding opportunity to get experience with all the major financial institutions in Edinburgh. You must be ...

Senior Commodities Credit Risk Role, Tier One House, London

You will be assisting in the analysis of exotic and structured transactions, and presenting this analysis to senior management. This is a senior ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation