ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Teenager cleared of email attack charge

Tom Espiner ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 02 Nov 2005 16:35 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A British teenager has been cleared of launching a denial-of-service (DoS) attack against his former employer, in a ruling that delivers another blow to the Computer Misuse Act.

Sitting at Wimbledon Magistrates Court, District Judge Kenneth Grant ruled that the youth, who can't be named for legal reasons, had not broken the CMA, under which he was charged. He was accused of sending five million emails to his ex-employer, causing the firm's email server to crash.

The CMA, which was introduced in 1990, explicitly outlaws the 'unauthorised access' and 'unauthorised modification' of computer material. Section 3, under which he was charged, concerns unauthorised data modification and tampering with systems.

The defendant was not called into the witness box during the trial, so he never confirmed whether or not the attack had taken place. The defence counsel argued that sending a flood of unsolicited emails would not cause unauthorised access or modification, as the email server was set up for the purpose of receiving emails.

Judge Grant told the court that "the computer world has considerably changed since the 1990 Act", and that there was little legal precedent to refer back to. He then ruled that DoS attacks were not illegal under the CMA.

In a written ruling, Judge Grant said: "In this case the individual emails caused to be sent each caused a modification which was in each case an 'authorised' modification. Although they were sent in bulk resulting in the overwhelming of the server, the effect on the server is not a modification addressed by section 3 [of the CMA]."

"On the narrow issue of an authorised or unauthorised modification, I concluded that no reasonable tribunal could conclude that the modification caused by the emails sent by the defendant were unauthorised within the meaning of section 3," Grant added.

Peter Sommer, expert witness for the defence, called for the CMA to be revised in the light of this trial.

"This is an interesting result, which highlights the need for reform of the CMA," Sommer said.

The teenager greeted the news with relief, although an appeal by the prosecution is still possible.

"I feel very happy. This has been going on for two years. At the moment, this is no longer hanging over my head," he told ZDNet UK.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
213 out of 283 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

Contract Trial Clinical Data Manager - Sussex South East UK

Contract Opportunity: Trial Clinical Data Manager Sussex South East UK Job Summary: This is an exciting opportunity for a successful Clinical Data ...

VB.Net, ASP.Net, SQL Server Developer needed by employer in Melksham

Huxley Associates are exclusively working on a .Net development role for a well established employer in Melksham. This company is expanding their ...

Service Delivery Manager- Leading Employer- to 45,000 pa + Bens

A leading employer in Hampshire is currently looking for a Service Delivery Manager to play an important role managing the relationship with a key ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation