Tsunami appeal site 'hacker' found guilty
Published: 06 Oct 2005 16:10 BST
A computer consultant has been convicted of gaining unauthorised access to a Web site collecting donations for victims of last year's tsunami, even though the judge hearing the case accepted that he meant to cause no harm.
Daniel Cuthbert of Whitechapel in London was found guilty on Thursday afternoon of breaching Section One of the Computer Misuse Act, 1990, on the afternoon of New Year's Eve, 2004.
Cuthbert, who at the time of his arrest had been employed by ABN Amro to carry out security testing, had pleaded not guilty to the charge. He was fined £400 plus £600 costs.
District judge Mr Q. Purdy, who heard the case, told Cuthbert it was "with deep regret that he was finding him guilty" given his record of unblemished good behaviour. But Judge Purdy also said that Cuthbert had changed his defence, between being interviewed by police at the beginning of the year and his appearance in court this week.
Judge Purdy said that Cuthbert was "deliberately trying to throw the police off the trail", by saying one thing and then another.
Earlier this year it was reported that Cuthbert had donated money to the Tsunami appeal using the text-only Lynx browser, which can appear to behave differently to other browsers from the server's point of view.
But in court on Wednesday, Cuthbert said he had made a £30 donation to the site, after clicking on a banner advert. When he received no final thank-you or confirmation page he suspected he might have fallen victim to a phishing scam, so he carried out two tests to check the security of the site.
Cuthbert's defence team had argued that he had merely 'knocked on the door' of the site, pointing out that he had the skills to break into it if he wanted.
Section one of the CMA says that it is an offence to make "unauthorised access to computer material". There is no burden on the prosecution to prove that the accused had intended to cause any damage.
Judge Purdy accepted that Cuthbert had not intended to cause any damage, and also pointed out there was almost no case law in this area.You can have your say about Cuthbert's conviction by voting in this poll.
Did you find this article useful?
95 out of 174 people found this useful
- Share this article:
Full Talkback thread
19 comments
-
Wow. Getting responses from ports on a network com... richard -
if there is a building and the front door is... spacelab10000 -
No, it's like walking around trying everyone'... Anonymous
-
"The only reason he did this is because he thought... Anonymous
-
The first person talks about connecting on co... Evil Wizard
-
As a programmer (not just another web surfer) I wo... Anonymous
-
I'm sorry if we offended the programmer -- wh... Matt Loney
-
He claims he was scared that the site was a phishi... Anonymous
-
If you'd like to tell the judge what you think of... Anonymous
-
Go to any security professional and they shou... Anonymous
-
Read the UK law, did he attempt to penet... Anonymous -
I understand that what he did broke... Anonymous
-
Going totally against the flow... John Airey
-
Ok first off the analogy that... Evil Wizard
-
Evil Wizard, what you say is t... John Airey
-
John I dont believe in this ca... Evil Wizard
-
Evil Wizard, if you can't beli... John Airey
-
There is an obvious breach of the Computer Misuse... Alex Pinheiro
-
Well if this is now a crime, then come get me righ... Anonymous
