ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Windows XP 'vulnerable to Zotob flaw'

Joris Evers CNET News.com

Published: 24 Aug 2005 08:50 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The plug-and-play vulnerability that wrought havoc among Windows 2000 users last week also holds a serious risk for some Windows XP users, Microsoft said on Tuesday.

Computers running Windows XP with Service Pack 1 in a specific configuration are vulnerable to worm attacks similar to the ones that hit Windows 2000 systems, Microsoft said in a security advisory published on Tuesday.

The Zotob worm and its offshoots, plus several other worms, downed Windows 2000 computers, including systems at ABC, CNN and The New York Times. All the worms exploited a security hole in the plug-and-play feature in Windows, for which Microsoft provided a fix earlier this month and rated as "critical" for Windows 2000.

It was previously thought that only Windows 2000 machines were vulnerable to remote attack using the plug-and-play flaw. However, Microsoft in its security advisory on Tuesday specified one scenario that also exposes select Windows XP users.

Also vulnerable are systems that run Windows XP with SP1 with file and printer sharing and the Windows guest user account enabled, according to Microsoft. It is likely that this would affect home users, because PCs are not vulnerable if connected to a network domain, Microsoft said.

"This is a minor and narrow attack scenario," said Debby Fry Wilson, a director at Microsoft's Security Response Center. "However, because Windows 2000 customers were attacked last week, we wanted to take the extra precaution of offering customers this clarifying information."

The probability that there are many vulnerable systems out there "is very remote", Fry Wilson said. Most consumers have upgraded their Windows XP machines to Service Pack 2, she said. In businesses, where Windows XP SP1 is more common, computers are not vulnerable because they are typically connected to a domain, she said.

Microsoft was made aware of the Windows XP attack possibility by security vendor Symantec, Fry Wilson said. Microsoft urges users to apply the security patches it provided earlier this month. Also, Microsoft is not aware of any attack exploiting the plug-and-play flaw that targets Windows XP.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
80 out of 164 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

C++ Telecomms Software Engineer - UMTS / GSM

Huxley Associates are working to urgently provide experienced C++ Software Engineers with specific telecomms domain knowledge to a small but highly ...

Service Co-ordinator

Service Co-ordinator Farnborough Up to 19,000 Purpose of the Job Working in the Centralised Service Co-ordination team to provide centralised ...

Java Developer. London. 40,000 Java, Servlets, JSP, Javascript

A leading provider of domain names and Internet related services is looking for a Java Developer. This company has registered hundreds of thousands ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation