ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

CA reveals 'high risk' flaw

Joris Evers CNET News.com

Published: 24 May 2005 17:40 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A high-risk security flaw in several of Computer Associates' antivirus products could put users at risk of cyberattack, the software vendor warned on Monday.

The flaw lies in the scanning engine used in CA's enterprise and consumer antivirus products, the company said. An attacker could gain full control over a victim's PC by sending a specially crafted Microsoft Office document, according to a security advisory published on the CA Web site.

CA rates the issue "high risk" because an attacker can gain full access to a computer without any user interaction, according to the advisory.

The flaw in CA's antivirus engine is the latest in a series of security bugs in antivirus software. During the past few months, problems have been found in products from Symantec, McAfee, F-Secure and Trend Micro.

Consumer products that contain the flawed engine include CA's eTrust EZ Antivirus and EZ Armor, a bundle that offers the antivirus product. Affected business products include eTrust Antivirus, Intrusion Detection and Secure Content Manager, according to the advisory.

CA publicly disclosed the security issue on Monday, but had a patch available on 3 May, said Sam Curry, a vice-president at CA.

The patch was made available to corporate customers, Curry said. "The consumer products are automatically being updated today," he said. CA counts between 3 million and 4 million consumers and about 1 million organisations as its antivirus customers, he said.

Consumers who are on more recent versions of EZ Antivirus and EZ Armor may find that their products have already been automatically updated, CA said. Users should check if the antivirus engine in their product is version 11.9.1. If it is a lower number, a virus signature update should be done to get the patch, according to CA.

Users of older versions are advised to upgrade or follow the guidelines in CA's advisory.

CA is not aware of anyone actually using the latest vulnerability in its products to attack users, Curry said. "This vulnerability is still only a potential vulnerability. There are no known exploits in the wild yet," he said. "However, I would say it is only a matter of time."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
49 out of 117 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. ...of course, a bigger security risk is that CA wi... Colin Jenkins

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

Graduate and Intern Opportunities with Google

While we're still committed to building the perfect search engine, our work here goes well beyond delivering accurate search results. One where the ...

IT Desktop Support - Helpdesk Support - 2nd line - Reading - 30k

Security Kaspersky, Sophos, Checkpoint Administration, MIMEsweeper Administration - Networking Cable & Patch Management , Network Protocols TCP/IP ...

C39490: AMS Digital Media Analyst

The Digital Media Consultants will be responsible for consulting our clients in digital media investments, including online marketing, paid search, ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation