Advertisement
Promo

Security threats Toolkit

Security guru backs writing down passwords

Munir Kotadia ZDNet Australia

Published: 23 May 2005 15:20 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Companies should not ban employees from writing down their passwords because it forces users to use the same weak term on many systems, according to a Microsoft security guru.

Speaking on the opening day of the AusCERT conference on Australia's Gold Coast, Jesper Johansson, senior programme manager for security policy at Microsoft, said the security industry had been giving out the wrong advice to users by telling them not to write down their passwords.

"How many have password policy that says 'under penalty of death you shall not write down your password'?" asked Johansson, to which the majority of delegates raised their hands in agreement. "I claim that is absolutely wrong. I claim that password policy should say you should write down your password. I have 68 different passwords. If I am not allowed to write any of them down, guess what I am going to do? I am going to use the same password on every one of them," he said.

According to Johansson, use of the same password reduces overall security.

"Since not all systems allow good passwords I am going to pick a really crappy one, use it everywhere and never change it. If I write them down and then protect the piece of paper — or whatever it is I wrote them down on — there is nothing wrong with that. That allows us to remember more passwords and better passwords," said Johansson.

Johansson said the security industry had been giving out the wrong advice about passwords for 20 years.

Delegates at the conference agreed that Johansson's advice made sense. However, they did not think it was practical.

One IT administrator from an international entertainment company, who requested anonymity, said that despite it being strict company policy to not make a note of passwords, he collated his personal passwords in an encrypted file because it "made more sense" than trying to remember multiple strong passwords.

Another delegate from a government agency, who also requested anonymity, said storing a password list in an encrypted file may work for the administrator but it would not work for users because they would then forget the password to decrypt the password file.

The delegate said that even using two-factor authentication — such as an RSA token — was not safe because people often write their pin number on a piece of paper and tape it to the back of the token.

"I know of a government minister that has done that," the delegate said.

Munir Kotadia reported from Sydney for ZDNet Australia. For more ZDNet Australia stories, click here.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
52 out of 109 people found this useful


Video icon

Video

Sentry Posts Blog

Official Organizations Losing Data

How does this article from earlier today make you feel? How many more government, health service, or military officials are going to lose pen drives, DVDs, USB hard disks and even entire... More

2 comments

Twitter hack was DNS redirect

Twitter has said an attack on Thursday which took the site offline for many users was the result of a DNS redirect. A group calling itself the Iranian Cyber Army redirected users... More

1 comment

McKinnon lawyers seek judicial review

Lawyers seeking a judicial review for Nasa hacker Gary McKinnon lodged fresh evidence of his psychiatric state at the High Court on Thursday. Karen Todner, McKinnon's solicitor,... More

1 comment

Win a BlackBerry with Vlingo voice recognition

Win a BlackBerry with Vlingo voice recognition

What is ZDNet UK's usual tagline?

Competition closes - 14 Jan 2010


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters