ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Tsunami Web site 'hacking' trial delayed

Andy McCue silicon.com

Published: 18 May 2005 11:30 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The trial involving the alleged hacking of a charity Web site set up to raise funds for victims of December's Asian tsunami disaster has been delayed yet again while witness reports are compiled by computer forensics experts.

Daniel James Cuthbert, 28, from Whitechapel in East London has been charged with one offence under section one of the Computer Misuse Act following what police called an "unauthorised" attempt to access the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC) Web site on New Year's Eve.

At his first appearance at Horseferry Road Magistrates court in London back in February, Cuthbert pleaded not guilty and was released on unconditional bail until April pending submission to the court of a report by an IT security expert witness.

A trial date was due to be set at the April hearing but the case was again adjourned due to delays in Cuthbert getting the legal aid approval required for his defence counsel to commission a computer expert. The expert was needed to conduct a forensic examination of the seized hard drive and compile a report.

At the latest hearing today, the court heard visiting London School of Economics fellow Professor Peter Sommer has now done 10 hours work examining Cuthbert's hard drive. But a further 30 hours of forensic examination are still to be completed.

The prosecution told the magistrate that depending on the contents of that report they may want to instruct their own computer forensics expert to examine the hard drive. Only when that has been completed can the court fix a trial date.

The case was adjourned until next month and Cuthbert was released on unconditional bail. The magistrate also excused Cuthbert's attendance at the next hearing due to him starting a new job.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
76 out of 143 people found this useful


Related Jobs

Computer Forensic Analyst

Your primary role will be to assist with all IT aspects of work, ranging from forensic computing and data mining engagements to developing complex ...

C#.NET AJAX Developer, 6 Month Contract

Our client near Tottenham Court Road Urgently requires a Senior C#.NET Developer for a 6 month Contract. Key Skills: C#.NET, AJAX, SQL, JavaScript ...

C++ Developer Forensics HORLEY 35,000

You will be involved with cryptography, password cracking, key recovery, steganography and steganalysis, metadata analysis and forensic hardware and ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation