ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Grand National extortion attacks 'unlikely'

Dan Ilet ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 08 Apr 2005 12:20 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The massive bandwidth extortion attacks that crippled online gambling sites last year are unlikely to be repeated ahead of this year's Grand National horse race, which takes place on Saturday, industry experts predicted on Friday.

According to police sources, complaints of attacks have eased off since the arrest of a gang believed to be behind a protection racket which forced Web-gambling firms to pay up or face long periods of downtime on their systems.

"An attack is unlikely," said a spokeswoman for the National Hi-Tech Crime Unit. "We arrested the people behind it in Russia last year."

Bandwidth attacks using networks of compromised computers, also known as distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, are used by hackers to cripple a Web site by sending its servers more data than they can process, ultimately forcing it offline. This type of attack was used last year against several betting Web sites to disrupt their operations.

"The number of [DDoS attacks] we get phone calls about is very low now," said Paul Lawrence, general manager at Top Layer, a vendor involved in protecting Web sites from DDoS attacks. "I can't say there's been an increase."

Last year, Russian police claimed that the gang behind the attacks has caused about £40m in damage. Yevgeny Yakimovich, the chief of the Russian Interior Ministry's Department K, which tackles cybercrime, said DDoS attacks were launched at nine UK bookmakers. Those responsible then demanded up to £28,000 before they would stop the attacks, which typically coincided with major sporting events.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
93 out of 165 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:



Related Jobs

C#, VB.Net Web sites / applications. ASP.Net, Flash, AJAX. to 34,000

ASP.Net developer with Flash, Flex or Silverlight is required by niche software consultancy, that develop a unique web base software application ...

Product Coordinator - Mobile & Web solutions

You can apply by email your CV to paul.danielcv@huntress.co.uk Huntress does not discriminate on the grounds of age, race, gender, disability, creed ...

Test Analyst - Automated & Manual - Web Testing

If you are illegible to work in the UK and would like to further your testing career within a industry leading organisation then please forward your ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation