ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Cybercrime hitting the UK hard

Dan Ilet ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 05 Apr 2005 13:10 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Electronic crime cost UK companies an estimated £2.45bn last year, the National Hi-tech Crime Unit (NHTCU) announced on Tuesday.

Out of 200 companies surveyed, 178 experienced some form of high-tech crime last year. Of those 178 firms, 90 percent claimed to have had their systems intruded and 89 percent said their data had been stolen.

"Billions of pounds are being lost to the UK economy through high-tech crime," said Detective Superintendent Mick Deats, deputy head of the National Hi-Tech Crime Unit. "Over the past year we have seen a sustained increase in the professionalism of cyber criminals. Companies are taking the brunt of criminals' attempts to steal money and data, but consumers are also being hit."

Speaking to ZDNet UK last week, Deats warned that organised gangs are taking a growing interest in cybercrime.

Virus attacks hit 97 percent of survey respondents, which cost them a total of more than £70m. Nine percent had suffered financial fraud, at a cost of £68m.

The NHTCU highlighted that external hackers were not the only threat to companies — crimes committed by employees also ranked highly, with the sabotage of data listed as the number one problem.

But Deats remained optimistic that the public was learning about online risks.

"On a positive note, we should acknowledge the increased effort put in by companies to protect themselves and their customers from this threat."

The NHTCU announced the survey results on Tuesday morning at the e-Crime Congress in London.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
61 out of 130 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

Financial Services - Risk and Compliance

Specific Technical Experience The individual will need change programme and systems implementation experience in a selection of the following areas: ...

Fraud Portfolio Manager - Midlands

Working as a Portfolio Manager in a Fraud Policy team you will be responsible for Fraud Strategy Definition, 3rd party Fraud Performance Tracking ...

Computer Forensic Senior Manager

It investigates financial crime (including fraud, money laundering and false accounting) and provides litigation support to clients involved in ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation