ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Clarke joins latest cyberterror debate

Dan Ilet ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 11 Feb 2005 14:25 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Richard Clarke, the former White House cyber security advisor, has criticised a UK company for using the term "cyberterrorism".

DK Matai, chairman of security consultancy company mi2g, put forward proposals to the Oxford University Internet Institute on Thursday night for a World Security Organisation to tackle cyberterrorism. Matai argued that the threat was so great that governments should consider setting up electronic counter-attack forces to battle radical groups and organised criminals online.

In response Clarke, who was a security advisor to four US presidents, said he disliked use of the word "cyberterror" as he doesn't believe it actually exists.

"Cyberterrorism is not a term I like," said Clarke, now chairman of Good Harbor Consulting. "Many different groups use cyber-vulnerabilities and it's hard to know who they are. Some may be terrorists, but not many. It's a very serious problem that costs millions, but it's not terrorism."

Matai made his proposals in a lecture to the Oxford University Internet Institute, an academic forum that debates on the development of the Web. Members include Derek Wyatt MP, chairman of the All Party Internet Group, and Richard Allan MP, chairman of the European Information Society Group.

Other security experts are also unconvinced that cyberterror poses a genuine threat, with one leading anti-virus expert branding the plans as "barmy".

Last year, the UK president of the Information Systems Security Association Richard Starnes said that cyberterror was not yet a reality.

"Cyberterrorism is a word that the press loves because it gets people to read stories," Starnes said. "A good portion of what we get is not terrorism. Terrorism is where you try and change the political situation of a country by using terror. Web defacements don't really count for that. Terrorists use the Internet for recruiting, fundraising and research, but not a lot else."

Other observers share his scepticism. Speaking at the CeBIT technology fair last year, security expert Bruce Schneier, chief technology officer of Counterpane Internet Security, said the threat posed by cyberterrorism had been overestimated. He added that rather than fostering a climate of fear, disrupting the Net and other communications networks would probably just annoy people.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
78 out of 167 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. Urgent - 'Experts' challenge mi2g Chairman's speec... mi2g Intelligence Unit

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

German Speaking HR Advisor - Professional services firm

My client a leading professional services concern is currently seeking a German speaking HR Advisor to work in their London based Head Office. You ...

HR ADVISOR SUPERB PACKAGE AND GREAT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY DARTFORD

My client are world leader's in their industry and are seeking a HR Advisor to provide general HR advice and support to a specified business unit ...

Manufacturing Engineer (Projects) - Oxford

Due to continued expansion they are currently seeking a Manufacturing Project Engineer to head up manufacturing projects form their Oxford based ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation