Do 'irresponsible' security researchers help or hinder?
Published: 26 Jan 2005 16:20 GMT
To many software makers and security consultants, flaw finder David Aitel is irresponsible.
The 20-something founder of vulnerability assessment company Immunity hunts down security problems in widely used software products. But unlike an increasing number of researchers, he does not share his findings with the makers of the programs he examines.
Last week, Immunity published an advisory highlighting four security holes in Apple Computer's Mac OS X -- vulnerabilities that the company had known about for seven months but had kept to itself and its customers.
"I don't believe that anyone has an obligation to do quality control for another company," Aitel said. "If you find out some information, we believe you should be able to use that information as you wish."
Despite efforts from Microsoft and other companies to direct how and when security alerts are sent out, independent researchers like Aitel are sticking to their own vision of flaw disclosure.
For them, software companies have become too comfortable in dealing with vulnerabilities -- a situation that has resulted in longer times between the discovery of security holes and the release of patches.
At the heart of the issue is the software industry push for "responsible" disclosure, which calls on researchers to delay the announcement of security holes so that manufacturers have time to patch them. That way, people who use flawed products are protected from attack, the argument goes. But the approach also has benefits for software makers, a security expert pointed out.
"As long as the public doesn't know the flaws are there, why spend the money to fix them quickly?" said Bruce Schneier, chief technology officer at Counterpane Internet Security, a network monitoring company. "Only full disclosure keeps the vendors honest."
Previous
Did you find this article useful?
211 out of 382 people found this useful
- Share this article:
Full Talkback thread
5 comments
-
I'm afraid my take on the whole disclosure uproar... Todd Knarr -
In my view it's OK to give the vendors some t... Arthur B. -
Here are a few key points:
1st: The guys who write... Michael
-
Mitsubishi Motors in Japan hid critical informatio... Anonymous
-
Let's face the issue head on! When a company knows... Anonymous
