ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

MP slams Cabinet Office's email destruction

Dan Ilet ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 21 Dec 2004 16:55 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The chairman of the All Party Internet Group has slammed the Cabinet Office for deleting millions of emails from its systems days before they would have been available to the public.

MP Derek Wyatt, who is currently leading a parliamentary charge to ban spam, said on Tuesday he would be disappointed if the government had resorted to clearing inboxes as a way of avoiding embarrassment from the Freedom of Information Act (FoI).

"It's wrong," said Wyatt. "Everyone knew about the Freedom of Information three years ago. Everyone signed up for it. The whole idea was to open up government and bureaucracy. If they have been deleting emails then I'm disappointed. End of story. We as MPs have been scrutinised on expenses for years. Why shouldn't the government?"

The Cabinet Office claimed yesterday it was deleting millions of emails to save taxpayers' money. Officials from the Prime Minister's right-hand office insisted the move was part of an ongoing management policy and not a way of ducking the Freedom of Information Act (FoI).

But treasurer of APIG and chairman of European Internet security lobbyist EURIM Brian White MP backed the Cabinet Office, even though he believes it is deleting emails in preparation for the Freedom of Information Act.

"Some of it I would expect is in preparation for the FoI," said White. "But that's not odd when there are remaining cases. The question is whether it's the right balance. I would question whether they are approaching it with more zeal than is reasonable. We always knew there would be a tidy up. But that's reasonable."

Private sector organisations such as financial services companies have to comply with strict auditing regulations, such as Basel II and Sarbanes Oxley, which dictate that all emails must be retained for seven years. If those companies are found to have destroyed data in connection with an audit trail, the chief executive of the firm can face a jail sentence.

But the Institute for the Management of Information Systems (IMIS) has said employees could be leaving themselves open to legal problems by deleting emails, because they may destroy records of what they have been ordered to do.

"It really is an odd thing to do," said Philip Virgo, strategic advisor to the Institute for the Management of Information Systems. "Either you don’t keep emails at all or you have a policy of auto-archiving them. But blanket deletion after three months is unusual."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
68 out of 126 people found this useful



Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

Graduate Careers in Information Systems

Graduate Careers in Information Systems Job Title: Standard Life Information Systems Graduate Trainee Scheme Location: Edinburgh Job Type: Permanent ...

Senior Information Manager

You must have a good working knowledge of Data Protection and Freedom of Information legislation along with commitment to confidentiality. LONDON ...

NHS Information Systems Project Manager Midlands

NHS Information Systems Project Manager Midlands A midlands based NHS organisation is looking for a information systems project for a challenging ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation