ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

ISPs raise the stakes on DDoS attacks

Dan Ilet ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 30 Nov 2004 12:45 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Internet service providers have hit back at claims they should be doing more to prevent denial-of-service attacks.

Security heads for BT and Cable and Wireless said that they can protect their customers from the attacks, but that they will not provide the service for free.

"Why should ISPs do something?" said John Regnault, head of security technology for BT. "It's very much as if people want something for nothing. This noise is superfluous and silly."

Regnault said that BT took DDoS attacks seriously for its customers and because it was a large ISP, it stood a better chance of defending from the attacks than smaller providers. He said that defending from DDoS attacks was a matter of customers paying for security.

"It is a question of what a customer is prepared to buy," he added. "There are a number of BT customers who are very happy with the DDoS defence. Perhaps if you are not prepared to pay that, you would jump up and down and say it's the duty of the ISP to do it. Perhaps I would say that it's time to change ISP."

Director of incident response for Cable and Wireless Richard Starnes agreed that customers should pay for DDoS protection.

"We get put into this position that ISPs should do more to promote anti-spam and antivirus," said Starnes. "We should do, but we're going to charge for it. We're a business and we have to support our shareholders and keep our employees in jobs. We're not going to do that by giving our services away for free."

Earlier this month Richard Clarke, the former cybersecurity advisor to the White House, called for ISPs to do more in protecting their customers. But Starnes said this was a general comment.

"It's kind of a blanket statement," he said. "We have responded to customer attacks and we've been instrumental [in defending] from them."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
89 out of 191 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. John Regnault should get a life. Customers are not... Dave Masters

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

ISP Network & Infrastructure Manager

ISP Network & Infrastructure Manager Zen Internet is the leading internet provider for Business, and as an award winning Internet Service Provider we ...

ISP Specialist Productr Manager Required Manchester 40k

My client, a leading ISP in the North-West is looking for a Windows based Hostings & Co-location product manager to join their developed team. This ...

Network Services Manager, ISP, Internet Services, London.

Network Services Manager, ISP, Internet Services, Cisco, Juniper, Foundry, DNS, TCP/IP, BGP, OSPF, SMTP, FTP, POP, IMAP, HTTP, HTTPS, Unix, Windows, ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation