ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Online protection rackets target clearing houses

Dan Ilet ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 21 Oct 2004 16:10 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Hackers are to threaten online clearing companies to pay up or face denial-of-service attacks on their Web sites, a security expert has predicted.

Credit card firms use clearing companies to authorise consumer transactions from retailers. According to Richard Starnes, director of incident response for Cable and Wireless, hackers will start taking down the Web sites of these companies unless they pay a ransom.

"These attacks are only launched at companies that rely 80 or 90 percent on Internet trading," said Starnes. "And they usually run on thin profit margins. So when [hackers] launch attacks, they hurt and they hurt badly."

Starnes said that by flooding Web sites of clearing houses with data, the attackers would automatically block databases from sending 'accept' or 'deny' commands back to the retailer. It was this that the hacking groups would prey on, he said.

"The organisations that are carrying out DoS attacks know exactly what they are doing," said Starnes. "It's not limited to online gambling. There are other vertical markets that are also being targeted."

A spokeswoman from the National High Tech Crime Unit said: "Any company that does all or most of its business online needs to ensure that its security is up to date and they are flexible to deal with attacks because they are at risk."

Starnes hinted that the small number of attacks he had seen were coming from Russia and Eastern Europe: "It's safe to say that this falls into the category of the usual suspects."

Last year, online betting companies experienced similar attacks. Alan Paller, the director of research for security organisation SANS recently claimed that every online bookie was being hit with the extortion attacks.

Starnes was speaking at the Secure Computing Conference in London.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
130 out of 218 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Related Jobs

Betting and Gaming Company (JAVA,J2EE)Java Developer-35K Sheffield

Huxley Associates in Manchester are working exclusively with WORLD LEADERS of Betting Company who are currently recruiting for JAVA/J2EE Senior Java ...

Expert Progress / Unix Developer for Leading Electrical Retailer, Nort

Expert Progress, Unix Developer for the software development team within a leading electrical retailer. It is based in their Head Office and is a ...

Oracle Developer- Financial Spread Betting- London

My client is the Worlds largest Financial Spread Betting firm who are performing well above industry standard and expanding at a good rate. They are ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation