ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Intrusion prevention security tipped to boom in Europe

Graeme Wearden ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 11 Oct 2004 12:45 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Sales of intrusion prevention systems in Europe continue to lag behind the US, but vendors expect them to catch up.

"The IPS market in Europe is a few quarters behind North America. But a couple of quarters ago is the time when IPS took off in the US," said Kip McClanahan, chief executive of TippingPoint, speaking at the NetEvents gathering of networking analysts, vendors and press in Barcelona on Friday. He added that TippingPoint expected to see a "very significant" uptake in demand in Europe, Middle East and Africa.

Intrusion prevention systems conduct deep-packet inspection of the traffic moving across a company's network. TippingPoint argues that IPS is a more sensible choice than an intrusion detection system, which will alert a network administrator of potential problems but not act against them.

Enterprise-class IPS systems aren't cheap. Price tags of £50,000 are not uncommon -- but in today's security climate they can make sense for large companies, and organisations such as universities which can't trust their end users to run their own security protection.

Both TippingPoint and Internet Security Systems, another IPS vendor, are keen to point out that IPS products protect against vulnerabilities rather than just exploits. Both companies say that their customers were protected from the recent JPEG virus, because the vulnerability it took advantage of had already been identified.

Other security companies told the NetEvents audience that 802.1x, which places authentication on each network port, will play a big role in network security. But the IPS vendors say it isn't enough to just put security on the perimeter.

"If I'm a malicious employee and I want to run something bad on your network, then port monitoring won't stop me," said Marc Willebeek-LeMair, TippingPoint's chief technology and strategy officer.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
57 out of 106 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

Network Security Technician - North London 20 25K+BONUS:

This IT Security Specialist - focuses on Intrusion Prevention, Anti Virus URL & Email Filtering Are you a person that can build upon this companies ...

Energy Markets Senior Business analyst - 65K Basic + Package London

My client is a Top 30 FTSE 100 company, providing gas and electricity to millions of people across the UK, Europe and North America via their ...

Technical Consultant, Fortinet, TippingPoint, Trapeze, FCNSA, Woking

The successful candidate will be experienced in Fortinet and/or TippingPoint technologies and any experience with Trapeze wireless solutions would ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation