ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Spam servers in China named and shamed

Graeme Wearden ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 30 Sep 2004 10:55 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Internet Society of China (ISC) has published the IP addresses of over one hundred servers that it says are being used to send unsolicited junk mail across the Internet.

This is the sixth time that the ISC has publicly identified alleged spam servers, and it is part of its ongoing attempts to clamp down on problem of spam. Many of the world's worst spammers are thought to be shifting their operations to China, as Western governments finally begin to face up to the issue.

The ISC blacklist runs to 112 separate IP addresses. The ISC will now monitor each server, and could attempt to close the servers down if the problem hasn't been addressed by the end of October.

Internet service providers could choose to block any mail from these servers.

Steve Linford, a leading anti-spam campaigner, warned back in June that many American spammers are using servers based in China.

Linford told the Openwave Messaging Anti-Abuse conference in London that some 70 percent of spam is sent from China by American spam outfits who are hosting their servers with Chinese ISPs. In many cases the spammers have set up firewalls so that the ISPs can't actually see what's being hosted.

"We keep battling with Chinese ISPs who don't understand what we are complaining about," said Linford, whose organisation run a number of blacklists in an attempt to prevent spammers sending their wares out onto the Web.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
102 out of 159 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. You state "The ISC blacklist runs to 112 separate... Anonymous

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

Network Security Technician - North London 20 25K+BONUS:

This IT Security Specialist - focuses on Intrusion Prevention, Anti Virus URL & Email Filtering Are you a person that can build upon this companies ...

Programme Manager

American Express can attribute much of its well-earned reputation as a leading corporate card provider to the unrivalled success of its technology ...

Application Support - Junior Level Role - Get into Front Office - PERM

If you are interested please could you update me on your current situation by sending your CV in Word Format? A leading American Investment Bank is ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation