ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Anti-spam firms hit back at Gartner claims

Dan Ilet ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 21 Sep 2004 16:00 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Anti-spam vendors were speculating on Tuesday about analyst firm Gartner's claims that the level of spam on the network is falling.

Gartner later added it was talking about the amount of spam making it through to the network, which it said indicated that anti-spam technology had improved.

Anti-spam vendors insisted that the general level of spam was still rising: "It's a massive problem, especially considering that 70 percent of spam is generated by botnets," said Mark Sunner, chief technology officer at MessageLabs. Spammers know the FBI know who they are, but they just don't care."

Yesterday at Gartner's IT Security Summit, Gartner vice-president Victor Wheatman said that the level of spam getting through the network was falling and it was now possible to work again.

But BlackSpider, another anti-spam firm, agreed with Sunner that spam was an increasing problem.

"It's definitely going up," said Emma Dunstone, marketing manager for the firm. "It was 63 percent in August, and 61 percent before that."

Delegates at the conference said they too were sceptical of Gartner's results.

"A lot of people say it's hype," said David Brittain of Coors Brewers. "But we see a lot of spam and I would say it's higher than anyone has said so far. I know it's in the vendors' interests to say that, but that's what we see too."

But some delegates felt that the level of spam was also rising on the network too: "It's not true that spam is declining," said Stuart Moen, security manager for the Royal Bank of Scotland CBFM. "In February, spam was 20 percent of all mail in our company. Now it's 52 percent. We haven't changed vendors. We use MessageLabs."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
74 out of 144 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. This was a bit of a misquote and I would appreciat... Victor S Wheatman

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

CCNP Qualified Cisco Network Technician, Contract Central Scotland

You must be CCNP/CCDA/CCIE qualified** You must have experience working with: - ASA Firewalls - Configuring and upgrading Switches & Routers - Cisco ...

Senior WAS Administrator 6 Month Contract Central Scotland

Please apply using the link below and contact Mark Tweedie Computer Futures Solutions on 0131 243 4000. Senior Websphere Application Server ...

Siemens S7 Control Systems Engineer, Long Term Contract - Scotland

ControlLogix, RSView, Panelbuilder) Please apply using the link below and contact Mark Tweedie, Computer Futures Solutions on 0131 243 4000. Siemens ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation