ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

US fingerprinting plan earns Big Brother's wrath

Graeme Wearden ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 28 Jul 2004 19:40 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A scheme that forces all visitors to America to be fingerprinted upon arrival has won this year's Lifetime Menace award from Privacy International.

The US VISIT scheme has been honoured in this way, according to PI, because of the "almost total silence" in the US over this programme.

"The scheme is offensive and invasive, and has been undertaken with little or no debate or scrutiny," claimed PI.

"Nor has the requirement taken any account of the 'special relationship' between the UK and the US. The UK government has been silent about the programme and has capitulated every step of the way," the civil rights group added.

The Right Honourable Charles Clarke, Britain's secretary of state for education and skills, was the runner-up for the Lifetime Menace award. Previous winners include Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who was recognised during his time as Home Secretary.

The prize of Worst Public Servant went to the Right Honourable Margaret Hodge, minister of state for children, for her involvement in the Children Bill, which includes tracking measures.

The upgrade of the NHS IT system was awarded the title of Most Appalling Project. In PI's view, the scheme will computerise all patient records in a way that is "both insecure and dangerous to patient privacy". Vodafone's move to block access to adult Web sites over its data network was a runner-up in this category.

The awards were announced on Wednesday evening at an event in London. They are titled the Big Brother awards, after George Orwell's visionary novel 1984.

Full list of winners and runners-up:

Worst Public Servant
Winner: The Right Honourable Margaret Hodge
Runners-up: Katherine Courtney, director, identity cards programme, Home Office, and Stephen Harrison, head, identity card policy unit, Home Office.

Most Invasive Company
Winner: British Gas
Runners-up: Lloyds TSB, FollowUS.

Most Appalling Project
Winner: The NHS National Programme for IT
Runners-up: Vodafone, The Safe Harbour Agreement

Most Heinous Government Organisation
Winner: The Office of National Statistics
Runner-up: The Department for Transport

Lifetime Menace
Winner: The US VISIT Programme
Runner-up: The Right Honourable Charles Clarke MP

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
135 out of 191 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:








Related Jobs

Integrated Children System Specialists

Business Analysts and Project Managers and Change Managers required to work in local government on the implementation of the Integrated Children ...

SOFTWARE ENGINEERS: ANALYSIS, VISUALISATION & DATA TEAM

SOFTWARE ENGINEERS: ANALYSIS, VISUALISATION & DATA TEAM 25,500 (package of up to 35,000 for exceptional candidates) + competitive benefits including ...

The Head of Information Security and Privacy Incident Response

The Head of Information Security and Privacy Incident Response is a senior member of the Vulnerability Management team with primary responsibility ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation