ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Three UK arrests in global piracy crackdown

Graeme Wearden ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 23 Apr 2004 12:45 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Officers from Britain's National Hi-Tech Crime Unit (NHTCU) made three arrests on Thursday as part of an international crackdown on Internet software piracy.

The men were detained at addresses in Belfast, Manchester and Sheffield, and are suspected of being part of a worldwide conspiracy that copied thousands of computer programs, film and music, and distributed them online.

The police seized a wide range of cracked software, as well as seven computers and 100 CD copiers.

"We were struck by the sheer quantity of material across all media, from business software to Sony PlayStation," said a NHTCU spokesperson.

No charges have yet been brought again the three, who have been released on bail.

The UK arrests were part of a global action dubbed "Operation Fastlink" that involved a total of 10 countries.

The operation specifically targeted an underground software piracy ring called Fairlight. This "warez" group has allegedly disseminated pirated copies of computer software, games, movies and music on the Internet.

Members of such groups may distribute material to "select clientele" over secure servers, and those files eventually end up on an Internet Relay Chat network or a peer-to-peer file-sharing service, according to the US Department of Justice.

Operation Fastlink is the second major piracy crackdown to involve the NHTCU. In 2001, it took part in an operation against an alleged piracy ring known as "drink or die", which was suspected of pirating millions of pounds worth of copyrighted software, games, music and digital videos.

CNET News.com's Jim Hu contributed to this report

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
48 out of 105 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

Flash developer - Action script version

Are you a technically focused Flash developer with strong AS2/3 development skills, OOP and flash animation and video experience? If so I would love ...

Principal Applications Specialists

Reviews upgrades and fixes available from system software suppliers and identifies those which merit action. Techniques which help in modelling and ...

Quality Assurance Engineer / QA Engineer - West London

Quality Assurance to ensure effective quality planning, evaluation, approval, monitoring, and corrective action management for DDT operations - ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation