ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Police play down Grand National hack threat

Graeme Wearden ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 31 Mar 2004 15:05 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Claims that organised criminals will launch a flood of electronic attacks on the Internet sites of British bookmakers this weekend are wide of the mark, the UK National Hi-Tech Crime Unit (NHTCU) said on Wednesday.

With the Grand National taking place this Saturday, it's been reported in some UK tabloids that criminal gangs based as far away as Russia have threatened online bookmakers with severe disruption. Threats have been made that customers will be prevented from betting on the Aintree race unless the companies concerned hand over large sums of money, it was claimed.

But according to a spokeswoman from the NHTCU, which has been investigating the general threat since last autumn, this is not the case and certain publications are guilty of "blowing the issue sky-high". 

"We've received no intelligence about UK betting sites being targeted ahead of any sporting events. The only time this has happened in the past was when the Super Bowl took place," said the NHTCU spokeswoman.

She confirmed that bookmakers had received a number of general threats in the past from people claiming that they would disrupt Web operations unless money was handed over, and that the NHTCU has been working with them to address the issue.

"Rather than paying up, the betting industry is taking a robust stance," added the NHTCU spokeswoman.

A number of online betting sites suffered distributed denial-of-service attacks ahead of January's Super Bowl, and it's been reported that some UK companies were targeted during March's Cheltenham horse festival.

One industry source has suggested that bookmakers themselves are keen to talk up the level of threat they are facing, as a way of making their customers aware of the possibility of future disruption.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
59 out of 151 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

Information Security Engineer - C++ or Java - London and EMEA

Using our unique technologies along with open source tools, we keep Google's customer-facing products running, robust and secure. If you enjoy ...

Senior Software Engineer - Interactive Development

Much more, its the key to driving forward a 4bn business, keeping eight million customers happy and delivering groundbreaking innovations like Sky +, ...

SNR JAVA DEV ROLE - CITY BASED BANK

Example projects you could potentially work on: Build functionality for Electronic Trading staff to disseminate important information to their ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation