ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Security 'slows down' Microsoft schedule

Ina Fried CNET News.com

Published: 17 Mar 2004 08:35 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Security concerns are slowing things down at Microsoft, but the company is still chugging along with its more ambitious projects, including Windows Longhorn, a company executive said on Tuesday.

The need to make its current software more resilient to attack is part of the reason that several projects have fallen behind schedule, senior vice president Bob Muglia said in an interview.

"It's absolutely slowed things down," Muglia said at the Microsoft Management Seminar here. "This work is making our software come out not as quickly."

Meanwhile, chief executive Steve Ballmer, who was slated to address the crowd tomorrow, will now not attend the show. Ballmer was in Europe meeting with regulators in an effort to settle antitrust charges.

Notably, Microsoft said last week that key updates to its developer tools and to its SQL Server database will be postponed until next year, a move that has the potential to delay a number of other Microsoft software programs whose development is linked to those programs. There is also concern that Microsoft's work on Longhorn -- the next version of Windows -- will be further delayed or scaled back. Muglia said the company has not lost its drive to take on big projects such as Longhorn.

"We're still pretty ambitious," he said.

Muglia said that more than half of the resources on the Windows team are still going toward Longhorn, though more effort than originally planned is going into improving existing versions.

"We have definitely taken a large percentage of our resources that would be working on new things like Longhorn and are dedicating [them] to security," Muglia said. "It has an impact on those (ship) dates."

However, Muglia said that customers seem in favour of the shift. "The response I get universally is that's the right thing to do," he said.

Along with providing patches and security enhancements with Windows XP Service Pack 2, Microsoft has said it is exploring ways of further updating both PC and server versions of Windows XP prior to the arrival of Longhorn, which analysts say may still be several years off. Microsoft originally planned to ship the software in 2005, but now offers no specific timeframe for when it might arrive.

Muglia said it is too early to say exactly what form the server update will take, but said a series of feature packs is more likely than a full interim release of the operating system. The update, targeted for 2005, is likely to include mostly features that were already planned to arrive ahead of Longhorn, Muglia said.

"We're looking at all of the things that have been under development for a while and that are either complete and available in the market and are in stages of competition that we can bring out in the 2005 timeframe," he said. "There's a lot of value there frankly that we'd like to deliver as soon as we can get it out there."

'More targeted attacks' ahead
Muglia said Microsoft is also still deciding how it will distribute the update and what, if anything, will require a separate fee. "In terms of packaging, I don't think we've figured out how to package it yet. We're still thinking that through," Muglia said.

In his keynote speech on Tuesday, Muglia said he did not expect security to wane as a concern for the industry, though he did expect a shift from generalised widespread problems to more narrowly aimed threats.

"We will see more targeted attacks," Muglia said. "That's sort of unfortunately the future we see over the next couple of years."

Muglia said the best way Microsoft can arm companies is to create software that gives IT managers more data on their systems and how they are running.

"The truth of the matter is a lot of the security problems that have happened are associated with areas which could have been prevented with the right tools."

"Now, it's our job to give people the right tools, and we haven't always done that... But if we can get the tools in the hands of IT (managers), they can then take the steps that they need to mitigate things."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
66 out of 110 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

C/C++ Software Engineer experience of PowerPC, ARM & MIPS? Bristol

You must have architecture experience, ideally with PowerPC, although experience with both MIPS and ARM will be considered. Our client is seeking an ...

Cisco Engineer - Immediate start

We are seeking a candidate with experience of providing 24x7 support for Cisco networks, working on a shift basis. Rates are 300 per shift ...

Transmission Controller

Your key responsibilities will include: -Ensuring the smooth running of all services originating from Sky's playout facilities and provide ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation