ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

File-swapping booms again

Marguerite Reardon CNET News.com

Published: 19 Jan 2004 09:50 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Illegal music downloading could be making a comeback, according to market researchers who note a surge in the use of peer-to-peer services.

The NPD Group, an independent market research firm, reported on Friday that peer-to-peer usage was up 14 percent in November 2003 from September. This upturn comes after six straight months of declines in digital file sharing. Usage dropped dramatically starting in April 2003, when the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) began its well-publicised campaign of threatening individual file sharers with legal action.

"It's important to keep in mind that file sharing is occurring less frequently than before the RIAA began its legal efforts to stem the tide of P2P (peer-to-peer) file sharing," Russ Crupnick, vice president of NPD, said in a statement. "We're just seeing the first increase in these numbers. NPD will continue to monitor whether it's a temporary seasonal blip or a trend that suggests that the industry should be more aggressive in capping the use of illegal methods to acquire digital music."

The RIAA has launched more than 300 lawsuits since it started its campaign against file swapping. Officials for the organisation have been optimistic about its success, pointing to polls that suggest that people are more aware of the risks involved in the practice.

But data from research firms like NPD throws more cold water on the music industry's claims that its lawsuits are working to actually deter people from illegally downloading music files. Even though overall usage of peer-to-peer services has declined by almost half since April 2003, earlier studies by NPD and others also suggested that large numbers of people have still been illegally downloading music files.

NPD uses two tools to monitor peer-to-peer activity. MusicWatch Digital is a tool that continuously examines PCs of roughly 40,000 participating individuals, recording which sites they have gone to and what they have downloaded on their hard drives. The ongoing survey has been compiling and analysing data on a monthly basis since April 2003.

The second tool, called MusicLab, is a traditional paper survey mailed to 5,000 individuals asking them to report their usage and Web surfing. The results represent the US population.

Information obtained from the MusicLab survey, which is compiled every other month, confirms the trends found by MusicWatch Digital. MusicLab data suggests that there was a sharp drop in usage starting in May 2003, when roughly 20 percent of computer users had downloaded music from peer-to-peer services. In July, the number dropped to 18 percent, and in September it was down to 11 percent.

By November, however, 12 percent of computer users were sharing music files.

So what's causing this increase? Crupnick had several suggestions.

For one, he said waning media coverage of lawsuits could have something to do with it. Even though the RIAA continues to file lawsuits, reporting of the issue by major consumer media has dropped dramatically from what it was in the months leading up to the September subpoenas.

Another possibility is that this increase is simply a reflection of traditionally high interest in music during the fourth quarter. Approximately one-fifth of music sales generally occur in November and December, according to NPD.

Crupnick also noted that in late October, several high-profile legal music downloading services were launched. Some people may have been checking out the illegal peer-to-peer sites again to compare music lists with what's now being offered on legal sites, he said.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
52 out of 128 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:



Related Jobs

Campaign Manager Avaya/Melitta - 25,000 - 30,000 Yorkshire

A very large Financial Institute are looking to bring in a Campaign Manager to help with the day to day running of a Melitta and Avaya Dialer system. ...

Lead Statistician and Survey Designer

A leader in market research has a new job for a lead statistician and survey builder to join them at company HQ in Oxfordshire. As lead statistician ...

Campaign Insight Analyst / SAS / CRM - Staines up to 38k

SAS, SAS Base, SAS Macro, Business Objects, BI Tools, CRM, Statistic, data interpretation, customer data analysis, linear regression, logistical ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation