ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Cisco Wi-Fi access point flaw lets snoopers in

Matthew Broersma ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 04 Dec 2003 12:25 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Cisco Systems is warning of a vulnerability in some of its Aironet Wi-Fi access points that could allow attackers to snoop on corporate networks.

Vulnerable access points will transmit security keys over the air in unencrypted text, meaning that an eavesdropper could intercept them. With the keys, an attacker could easily break the encryption protecting Wi-Fi transmissions. Wi-Fi is a wireless standard commonly used in corporate and personal local-area networks.

The bug affects Aironet 1100, 1200, and 1400 series access points running Cisco IOS software releases 12.2(8)JA, 12.2(11)JA, and 12.2(11)JA1. The affected equipment transmits cleartext versions of Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) static keys to the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) server. WEP is a security protocol defined in the Wi-Fi 802.11b standard, designed to give wireless networks the same level of security as a wired LAN. SNMP allows companies to monitor the operation of network devices via a central server.

The devices are only affected when the "snmp-server enable traps wlan-wep" command is enabled, and does not affect dynamically set WEP keys. Cisco access points running VxWorks are not affected. The keys are transmitted only when the access point is rebooted or the static WEP key is changed.

Attackers will only be able to snatch WEP keys if they are able to monitor data sent between the access point and the SNMP server.

Cisco said users should upgrade to IOS version 12.2(13)JA1 or later, or switch off the SNMP command in question. Instructions for the fix are detailed in Cisco's advisory.

Users can also get around the problem by switching to an authentication protocol that uses dynamically set keys, several of which are supported by the access points.

Cisco's access points have recently been the subject of several security warnings. In July, Cisco patched a pair of security flaws that were discovered in its Aironet 1100 series wireless access points. One flaw would have allowed an attacker to use a "classical brute force" technique to discover account names, while the second could freeze the access point and bring down the wireless access zone.

In August Cisco said its LEAP (Lightweight Extensible Authentication Protocol) could allow an attacker to guess user names and passwords in a "dictionary attack".

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
41 out of 95 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

Vendor Manager/Service Delivery Manager: W.Yorkshire FTSE 100 50,000

Have you worked with some of the largest supplier names in IT? Vendor Manager/Service Delivery Manager will consist of 4 key points: - Creating, ...

Fix Protocol Analyst - Contract - London City & NY

Fix Protocol Analyst - Contract - London City & NY A contract role with a consultancy within a financial institution. The successful candidate will ...

Business Analyst - Client Liaison - London

You should be confident, presentable and highly articulate as you will be representing the external face of Thomas Murray to some of the financial ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation