ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Virus damage costs increase fourfold

Munir Kotadia ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 02 Dec 2003 15:30 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

It costs four times more to clean up after a virus than previously thought, according to a survey of large enterprise IT departments.

Compared with previous estimates, costs associated with cleaning up after a virus or worm attack have increased by more than 400 percent over the past 12 months, to £122,000, says The Corporate IT Forum, which represents the corporate IT user community.

The Forum surveyed its members, which include more than half of the FTSE 100 and 250 companies, after the MSBlast worm this August. The figure of £122,000 is four times that estimated by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) last year.

According to the survey, three out of four IT departments spent around 365 person-hours repairing damage caused by the attack. However, 35 percent of organisations were hit far worse, with each losing an average of 3,080 person-hours.

David Roberts, chief executive of the Corporate IT Forum, said the costs associated with worm and virus clean-up are much higher than expected, especially for smaller companies that do not have the resources required to implement a strong security policies: "Our research is just the tip of the iceberg. The companies surveyed have better than average security and incident response policies in place. Organisations with relatively poor protection will be being hit even harder as they will suffer more downtime and wider business disruption -- as well as getting more viruses in the first place," he said in a statement.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
103 out of 190 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:











Related Jobs

External Auditor - 40,000 - 45,000 - Bristol

Jp gray is seeking an External Auditor to join a FTSE 250 UK market leading Company based in Bristol. The role will involve liasing with the senior ...

ERP Manager, + Bonus + Career to Partner level, City

This is a rare opportunity for a Project Manager to grow, develop and take charge of multiple, exciting projects within FTSE 100 companies. The ...

Senior Risk Manager Actuarial 70K+ Benefits Edinburgh

Division and to contribute to the wider financial risk team and assist in the embedding of the financial risk framework across the I&I Division. ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation