ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Shareholders bring down axe on Baltimore

Matt Loney ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 28 Nov 2003 16:40 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Baltimore shareholders on Friday voted overwhelmingly to sell the company's PKI business, which owns the UniCert software, to be US-based beTrusted. The sale means that beTrusted, the security services company formed by PricewaterhouseCoopers, will acquiring Baltimore's 300 PKI customers.

Baltimore is now likely to go into voluntary liquidation, said chief executive Bijan Khezri, saying that the vote backed up the board's belief that Baltimore "should not continue operating as a subscale software infrastructure vendor in a consolidating industry."

The board's objective now, said Khezri, is to minimise the company's liabilities. It's a far cry from Baltimore's heyday as Ireland's darling of the dot-com boom, valued at £7bn -- more than the Bank of Ireland's valuation at the time. Baltimore is now left with hardware and software support services, which it has said it plans to dispose of shortly, and an estimated £25m in cash.

"The options available to Baltimore going forward are principally threefold: returning cash to shareholders, a reverse takeover or an acquisition," said Khezri. "In the Board's view, together with its advisors, the return of cash to shareholders can best be achieved by way of voluntary liquidation."

The sale marks the end of Baltimore as a security software company, in which capacity it struggled to sell the complicated and expensive concept of PKI. A public key infrastructure is a framework that provides security services to an organisation using public-key cryptography. These services are managed using certificates that are issued from a central certificate authority. Friday's sale embodies the general failure of PKI technology to match the hype that it generated over the past few years, say analysts.

"The promise of PKI hasn't happened," said Ovum principal analyst Graham Titterington. "And I don't think it will. It is expensive and costly to implement. Businesses have felt it is just not worth the expense. The whole thing turned out to be pie in the sky."

James Governor, principal analyst at RedMonk, said Baltimore's mistake was to bet the house on PKI. "It is also difficult to sell a portfolio that has a lot of different pieces related by a theme, and you're trying to tie them together," said Governor, referring to Baltimore's attempt a year ago to package up its PKI technologies.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
47 out of 102 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

Classic ASP Developer, Northern Ireland

My market leading financial services client based in Belfast, Northern Ireland is looking for Classic ASP developer with strong SQL Server ...

Business Analyst - Cash Managment, Funds, Transactions

Business Analyst - Cash Managment, Trade Management, Funds, Transactions - Investment Bank Our client is seeking to strengthen it's global brand ...

S51873: Cash Management Analyst Programmer

Cash Management Analyst Programmer Knutsford, Cheshire competitive depending on experience (+exceptional benefits) Purpose of Role The role is on an ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation