ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

BEA joins rush to security

Martin LaMonica CNET News.com

Published: 13 Oct 2003 11:35 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

BEA Systems, a maker of Java-based server software, plans to enter the market for application security later this month, joining a growing cadre of large software providers that are making security a top priority.

On Monday, BEA intends to introduce WebLogic Enterprise Security (WLES), a software package for enforcing employee or business partner access privileges to corporate applications. The initial product, which is set for delivery by the end of October, is based on security software that BEA gained through the acquisition of CrossLogix earlier this year.

BEA's security push mirrors the moves of application server competitors that supply software to build and run corporate applications, such as Web sites and banking systems. Application server companies are building authorisation capabilities, once the exclusive realm of security specialists, within their respective products.

IBM has been selling its WebSphere Java middleware with its Tivoli-branded security products to authorise a person's identity for some time, analysts note. Sun Microsystems already sells an "identity server" with its Java application server and Oracle is expected to outline its security plans next week. Microsoft, meanwhile, has labelled security a top priority and has numerous initiatives, including its Trustworthy Computing initiative, to make software programs more secure.

"Everybody that is selling application platforms has found that people want this type of access management built in," said John Pescatore, an analyst at Gartner. "If you're selling against Oracle and IBM, this is an area that BEA had to fill in."

Companies can use the WLES system to control access to business applications that run on BEA's WebLogic Platform version 8.1, which is a suite of server software products, including a corporate portal, that are based on the Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) standard.

WLES will also include Java-based tools to allow a company to tie other applications into BEA's security system, including home-grown or packaged applications written with other programming languages. Follow-on versions of WLES, due next year, will work with IBM's competing WebSphere Java server suite as well as with applications written using Microsoft's .Net line of tools, said George Kassabgi, the general manager of application security infrastructure at BEA.

Most existing security products rely on a centralised server to authorise and authenticate a person's entry into a network. BEA's WLES, by contrast, has a distributed set-up built around a single server. It also has "security service modules" -- small applications that reside on several servers on a network. Placing the software that tracks the security policies on several network nodes will allow users to get quicker access to applications, Kassabgi said.

WLES also allows administrators to secure specific software components within a large application. For example, a brokerage company could authorise a stock trader to execute only certain trades at certain times.

BEA said that its security software can work with a company's existing network directories and with security products -- from companies such as Netegrity and Oblix -- that authorise access to a corporate network or a Web site. Or, customers can choose to use all-BEA software for the authorisation.

BEA could start competing with established security companies with its WLES initiative, particularly as it tries to sell the products to its existing customers, said analysts.

"You're seeing the beginnings of a competitive threat coming from big application development and deployment companies to some of the traditional security companies," Earl Perkins, an analyst at Meta Group, said.

Although traditional security companies such as VeriSign have more mature authorisation products, BEA's distributed approach to security and its focus on application development and deployment sets it apart, Perkins said.

"What BEA is attempting to do is to formalise its approach to integrating security within the application for different platforms and different development environments," he said. "It's taking authorisation and authentication to the next step."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
66 out of 103 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:



Related Jobs

Analyst Programmer

County Council provides an attractive environment where work/life balance for our people is a key priority and where we are keen to help you in your ...

Senior Java Developer ( J2EE, Oracle, SQL, Unix)

The Senior Java Developer will have knowledge of both BEA Weblogic 8.1 and SOA implementation. The senior Java Developer will be working on a number ...

J2EE / Java Developer - J2EE, Java - Greater London

REQUIREMENTS - Full project lifecycle experience in delivering complex, high volume applications onto the Internet - Solid core Java programming ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation