ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Netgear flaw triggers 'accidental' DoS attack

Munir Kotadia ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 26 Aug 2003 13:50 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Network hardware maker Netgear has warned its customers of a flaw in some of its router products that could set off an "accidental" denial of service (DoS) attack.

The problem occurs because of a flawed implementation of the Network Time Protocol (NTP), which is a method commonly used by network devices to contact special "time" servers that pass on the correct time and date. This information is important for routers because they generate a variety of time-sensitive logs.

The flawed routers work fine until the moment one of their periodic requests for the correct time goes unanswered. If for whatever reason the "time" server is unavailable, the flawed router will continue sending requests until it is answered.
 
Earlier this year, the University of Wisconsin's NTP server was the victim of a huge DoS attack. The University claims it was receiving 250,000 requests per second, which equated to hundreds of megabits per second. The attack was not planned or malicious, but caused by hundreds of thousands of low-cost Netgear routers repeatedly requesting the latest time, causing the University's NTP server to fail.

According to the University of Wisconsin, which is currently working with Netgear to resolve the issue, the "unexpected behaviour of these products presents a significant operational problem for years to come." A full report of the attack is available on the University's Web site.

Only Netgear router models RP614, RP614v2, DG814, MR814 and HR314 are affected by the flaw. Anyone using one of these models should upgrade their firmware with an appropriate patch from the Netgear Web site.

Netgear did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
49 out of 102 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:









Related Jobs

CCNA/CCNP Cisco Engineer - Routers/Switches/Firewalls - Bath

The ideal candidate will have a skill set to include as many of the following: CCNA or CCNP certified, Routers, Catalyst Switches 29xx, 35xx and ...

Broadband Consultant - IP DSLAM / ADSL - Immediate Start!

Broadband Testing - Thomson CPE DSL Modems & Routers - Internet Protocol Suite & Wireless Networking Protocols - TR-069 - Linux / Ubuntu Apply Now! ...

Network Administrator/ CCNP/ Cisco/ Switches/ Routers/ MPLS/ 40k

Network Administrator/ CCNP/ Cisco/ Switches/ Routers/ MPLS/ OSPF/ BGP/ EIGRP/ 40k Worlds leaders in Technology are looking for a Network ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation