Advertisement
Promo

Security management Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;214682528;14505427;f?http://uk.blackberry.com/ataglance/security/

How CIOs can help fight cyberterror

Karen Ann Kidd

Published: 24 Jul 2003 14:44 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

CIOs already feel assailed as they deal with internal and external threats to the network, but a new book due out in August outlines a broader threat to computer infrastructures, including the Internet.

This book, Black Ice: The Invisible Threat of Cyber-Terrorism, details how cyberterrorism could occur, the global and financial implications, and the effect it could have on privacy and civil liberties. It also contains advice on how to prepare for and prevent cyberterrorism.

The author, Dan Verton, is a former US intelligence officer and a senior investigative reporter at Computerworld. He won first place in this year's Jesse H. Neal National Business Journalism Awards for his series of stories about wireless homeland security. He also maintains his own National Security Journal.

Verton agreed to answer some questions for TechRepublic.com.

TechRepublic: Your average geek might see the threat to the United States' computer infrastructure as clear and present.
Verton: Actually, the situation is quite the opposite. The average computer security practitioner doesn't bring to the table a sophisticated, long-term view of international terrorism. As a result, they approach issues of terrorism based on the historical examples that we currently have to work with. According to this way of thinking, all terrorists are simple-minded, bloodthirsty killers with no other objective but to shed blood. This is dangerous, inflexible thinking -- the same type of thinking that allowed us to ignore evidence dating back eight years that al-Qaeda was interested in using commercial airliners as precision strike weapons. The truth of the matter is that modern global terrorism is a thinking enemy that understands the only way to force America to withdraw from the world is to strike at the soft underbelly of the US economy, which is its digital infrastructure. You're not always going to feel terrorised from a cyberterrorist incident that aims to create fear and uncertainty by striking at the economy.

Is the United States more vulnerable than any other developed nation?
Yes and no. Although all modern, industrialised economies now rely on computers and computer networks for most, if not all, of their vital human and economic services, the United States remains the driving force of the global technology industry. As a result, the United States is often a first-adopter of many untested technologies that bring with them unintended consequences, particularly in the realm of security. Secondly, as a superpower, the United States has many enemies around the world who now have cyberweapons that are relatively easy to use and provide a reasonable level of safety and anonymity for the attacker.

The Internet was developed as an alternative communication and information source in the event of nuclear war. How vulnerable is it, really, to cyberterrorism?
Some information security practitioners like to think of cyberterrorism in terms of what has become known as a digital Pearl Harbor--a surprise attack that has devastating consequences for the entire US information infrastructure. Fortunately, this level of strategic attack falls only within the capability of one or two nation states that are willing and able to use the full range of military options at their disposal. However, a successful cyberterrorist attack that combines both physical and cyber elements on a regional scale is certainly within the capabilities of terrorist organisations today. In fact, tabletop exercises conducted by actual owners and operators of critical infrastructures in the Pacific Northwest (code named Black Ice, from which I took the title of my book) have already demonstrated how cyber- or physically induced failures in one sector of the economy, such as electric power, can cause cascading failures in multiple infrastructure sectors.

Next

Previous

1 2


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
123 out of 240 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Video icon

Video

Sentry Posts Blog

DNA details of innocent will be kept f...

The government has announced that it plans to keep innocent people's DNA details for up to six years. In response to a consultation it launched last December, the government said... More

5 comments

Motorola Droid Drops Today: Happy Droi...

Motorola Droid Drops Today: Happy Droid Day America! Author: Eric Everson, Mobile Security Expert If you’re wondering what all of the buzz is about with words like Droid and Android... More

Post a comment

Mobile Security Profile: BlackBerry St...

Mobile Security Profile: BlackBerry Storm2 Author: Eric Everson BlackBerry handsets are a staple of office culture; from syncing calendars to sharing business-related data,... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
It seems to me this is a burden being placed on the wrong shoulders. There is not an It system in the world that can stop an individual taking information in their heads and spewing out at the nearest undesirable third party.

By: RonaldWilkins

Read full story:
Deloitte: People are still weakest security link


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters