ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Korean group plans Slammer lawsuit

Winston Chai CNet Asia

Published: 06 Feb 2003 15:14 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A South Korean rights group may take Microsoft to task for the carnage caused by the Slammer worm last month.

The People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (PSPD) is considering a class-action suit against Microsoft for not doing its utmost to prevent the widespread devastation of the bug, the Korea Times reported.

Slammer, also known as the Sapphire worm and SQLExp, exploits vulnerabilities in Microsoft SQL 2000 Web servers and causes increased traffic between servers.

This heightened data transfer crippled Internet networks worldwide two weeks ago, with Korea bearing the brunt of the damage as Asia's most wired nation.

"Although Microsoft said it issued warnings about the worm through emails and other public notices, we do not believe the company performed its duty to the fullest, considering it had a list of all SQL Server users," a PSPD representative said.

The group intends to base its case on a product liability law that holds the manufacturer responsible for property damage inflicted by product flaws.

PSPD added it has garnered support for the lawsuit from more than 3,000 broadband subscribers in Korea.

When contacted, a Microsoft Asia-Pacific representative said the company could not comment on "what looks like speculation" at this stage.


For all security-related news, including updates on the latest viruses, hacking exploits and patches, check out ZDNet UK's Security News Section.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
26 out of 99 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

C++, Java Software Developer - C, C++, Java, C# - North Oxfordshire / Midlands

We are established in the UK, Europe and Asia as a specialist supplier to Formula 1, automotive, R & D establishments, universities and medical ...

Asset Manager - Support Analyst

A vacancy has arisen for an IT Support Analyst to work within a dedicated front office systems team servicing a leading Asset Manager with offices in ...

SAP BW Lead Consultant Oil Goliath

A major rollout program, led by another Finance group, is currently underway for implementing SAP financial systems across Europe and Asia/Pacific, ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation