ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Homeland security waiting for Wi-Fi

Published: 05 Dec 2002 11:33 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Security needs to become a priority for users and makers of wireless networking equipment in order to stop insecure connections from being used to attack federal and corporate systems, network experts said Wednesday.

Speaking at the 802.11 Planet Conference here, security professionals pointed to a lack of focus on hardening the wireless infrastructure as a flaw in government discussions about protecting the nation's critical infrastructure.

"There are a lot of networks behind wireless (access points), so we have to see ourselves as a part of the larger whole," said Daniel Devasirvatham, vice president of the wireless systems group at government contractor SAIC.

Devasirvatham said SAIC has disconnected its wireless networks until the company is sure they are secure, but many other companies' networks are wide open because attackers could enter through the wireless local area network.

In July, President's Bush's special adviser on cybersecurity, Richard Clarke, told security experts that users and makers of wireless equipment were among the five top groups responsible for the Internet's insecurity.

But despite the new Wireless Protected Access standard that aims to boost security, at the moment there aren't many products for the security-conscious wireless user, said Shannon Myers, master security architect for telecommunications giant Cable & Wireless, at a panel focussing on homeland security and wireless.

"There is not a lot of technology out there that can do what needs to be done," Myers said.

Myers pointed to the latest document from the National Institute of Standards and Technology on wireless security as a partial solution. The document, dubbed SP 800-48, suggests some security policy changes for users of wireless networks and Bluetooth technology.

"We need to find a good balance," Myers said. "The government is trying, and industry is trying, but it is going to take some give and take to get there."


Discover the latest developments in Wi-Fi, 3G, GPRS and other cutting-edge wireless technologies at ZDNet UK's Wireless News Section.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Telecoms forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
43 out of 73 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

Money motivated sales people or graduates required - Birmingham

Day to day you will be consulting with clients across the entire spectrum of a companys hierarchy to discover their recruitment needs, whilst ...

Graduate Opportunities

With the support of a parent bank with a balance sheet of over 996 billion, Barclays Capital have offices in 26 countries employing over 15,700 ...

ERP Manager, + Bonus + Career to Partner level, City

If you are an up and coming successful Project manager and are looking for a dynamic and challenging new position within a Market leader that ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation