File-name flaw threatens PGP users
Published: 06 Sep 2002 06:56 BST
Security-consulting firm Foundstone said Thursday that email messages encrypted with the Pretty Good Privacy program can be used as digital bullets to attack and take control of a victim's computer.
Because of a flaw in the way PGP handles long file names in an encrypted archive, an attacker could "take control of the recipient's computer, elevating his or her privileges on the organisation's network," Foundstone said in an advisory.
The company classified the vulnerability as a high risk "due to the trusting nature of encrypted attachments in email, its relative ease of exploitation and the large amount of corporations and military and government agencies that rely on PGP encryption for secure communication."
The flaw affects PGP Corporate Edition 7.1.0 and 7.1.1. Software maker Network Associates has posted a patch on its site. The company recently sold all PGP assets to a start-up, PGP Corp., but appears to still be providing support for the program. Neither company could be reached for comment.
The flaw occurs in the way PGP handles long file names in encrypted archives, Network Associates said on its site. PGP runs into problems when it tries to encrypt or decrypt files that have names longer than 200 characters. When PGP attempts to decrypt the files, a buffer overflow causes it to crash.
The long file names aren't readily apparent to a recipient of such an email, said Foundstone chief executive George Kurtz.
"It is just like a ZIP file," Kurtz said. "You can name a file with eight characters, but archived in the file are several other (files) with long file names."
The danger, Kurtz said, is that the flaw could be used to attack users who have the most to protect. "Most users of PGP have some level of security sophistication. It makes it that much more of a high-level attack," Kurtz said. An attacker could "obtain that very valuable information that was meant to be protected by encryption."
The flaw is unrelated to another theoretical vulnerability discussed by security experts last month. Exploiting that flaw, someone could fool the sender of a PGP-encrypted email into decoding their own message. Unlike the current flaw, that vulnerability wouldn't give the attacker control of a computer.
The current vulnerability resembles another flaw in the PGP plug-in for Outlook, found in early July.
Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Security forum.
Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.
Did you find this article useful?
37 out of 101 people found this useful
Digg
Slashdot
Del.ici.ous
Stumble
Reddit
