ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Net users falling for "AOL virus" joke

Robert Lemos, ZDNet News ZDNet US

Published: 11 Jun 2001 11:51 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Created as a spoof of the recent sulfnbk.exe hoax, a joke warning people of a virus named AOL.exe has some deleting the Internet program from their computers.

After posting a farcical virus advisory on his Joke-A-Day site warning people to delete the "insidious" AOL.exe virus, webmaster Ray Owens found that quite a few of his readers actually believed it. Worse, they forwarded it to their friends.

The result: Owens received more than 700 letters, some congratulating him on the joke, but quite a few others asking him if the "warning" was real. He even got a handful from people who had taken the warning seriously and deleted America Online from their system.

"The smart people had a good laugh, and the dumb people were scared as all get out," he said.

The joke advisory mimicked a sham that spread through email last week. The hoax told people that a benign Windows file -- sulfnbk.exe, used to allow long filenames under DOS -- was actually a virus. Many people believed the message and deleted the file.

"It has been brought to my attention that there's an insidious new computer virus which has already affected close to 30 million computers," Owens' satirical advisory read. "Even though I'm running the latest McAfee and Norton viri scans, neither have picked up this virus, as it's a mutating virus that isn't set to go off until Friday, June 8, 2001."

Copies of the AOL.exe hoax made it as far as Rob Rosenberger, editor of the Virus Myths homepage. While Rosenberger hasn't seen many copies of it, he did warn his readers of the hoax.

"There was about four or five people who deleted it, but there was only one AOL person who contacted me," Owens said. "Maybe that's because all the others can't get online anymore."

Is your PC safe? Find out in ZDNet UK's Viruses and Hacking News Section.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the Security forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
21 out of 91 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:








Related Jobs

S48892: SAP Specialist - 3rd Line Support

Perform system & client copies. SAP Specialist - 3rd Line Support Warwick up to 40,000 plus on call allowance and excellent benefits Established in ...

Senior Programming Assistant, G6

Senior Programming Assistant, G6 OSCE Secretariat Vacancy Notice Number: VNSECG00305 Duty Station: Vienna, Austria Deadline for Application: ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation