ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Bull red-faced over Web site security breach

Will Knight ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 20 Feb 2001 15:02 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Computer experts say they uncovered yesterday a well-known security vulnerability in the UK Web site of Bull, which would have exposed employee usernames and passwords to hackers.

The incident is an embarrassment for the firm, which prides itself in developing secure enterprise solutions, smartcards and software for secure infrastructure and Intranets. In France, Bull is IBM's main competitor in the enterprise space.

A spokeswoman from Bull confirmed the vulnerability: "Due to a software problem, unauthorised individuals were able to get access to a system file on the Web site," she said. "They did not get past the firewall or other security measures. The problem has since been rectified and no security risk was posed."

The security hole was exposed by French activists Kitetoa who probe corporate Websites for weaknesses. A Kitetoa spokesman, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the flaw -- originally discovered over a month ago by bug hunter George Guninski -- gave access via a Web browser to the system's Security Account Manager (SAM) file, which contains vital system usernames and passwords.

Four sets of usernames and passwords were exposed, including those of the administrator, which gives complete control over the machine.

Bull said the passwords were unuseable because they were encrypted, but the Kitetoa expert argued that it is possible to decrypt the passwords using a commonplace security tool called L0phtcrack. "It's just a matter of time," he said.

News of the vulnerability may seem like Deja Vu to the French firm. In September, Kitetoa revealed a more serious problem with servers owned by Bull, which revealed confidential information belonging to Bull and to a number of its corporate customers.

Computer security experts at @Stake confirmed the validity of the vulnerability but stressed that a technical flaw such as this does not in itself mean insecurity. "It is important to mention that these passwords would potentially have been old," says managing security architect with @Stake, Ollie Whitehouse. "If Bull had a good password policy in place, changing passwords every month or so, the risk would have been relatively low."

Is your PC safe? Find out at the Hackers News Special

Take me to ZDNet's Small Business Special.

Take me to ZDNet Enterprise

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the ZDNet News forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
50 out of 109 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:














Related Jobs

Security Consultant - Immediate start

The desired candidate will have the following skillset: * Network Vulnerability Internal & External Testing * Configuration of Cisco switches / ...

Desktop Support 21284

You will be exposed to technologies such as XP, the Bloomberg API, VOIP, MAC's, AV, Media streaming and many more. Dental and Travel insurance ...

.NET Developer North East Immediate start

Interview slots confirmed for next week. You must have experience in building and maintaining high volume content managed websites and applications. ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation