ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Symantec reveals software-updating patents

Robert Lemos, ZDNet News ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 08 Feb 2001 14:52 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Security software maker Symantec Wednesday notified rivals that it owns a pair of patents covering its method for updating virus software and definitions incrementally.

It was unclear why Symantec waited until now to reveal the patents, which were granted last year. A representative at rival McAfee said McAfee had not known of the patents and is looking into the matter.

The patents guard a key component of Symantec's Norton AntiVirus 5.0, 2000, and 2001 products, which the company calls its "microdefinition system" and which allows data that is updated frequently to be efficiently patched.

"When there is a lot of content that has to be updated regularly, this can be handy," said Carey Nachenberg, chief researcher for the Symantec AntiVirus Research Center and one of the patent holders. "When you have so many updates, it is unaffordable and inefficient to post thousands or millions of patches."

The debate over software and business patents has heated up over the last 18 months.

In October 1999, online bookseller Amazon.com sued rival Barnes & Noble for infringing on its patent on buying books with a single click of the mouse. Later, Amazon grabbed patents for a recommendation service and an affiliate program. Then, Amazon chief executive Jeff Bezos and Tim O'Reilly, Amazon's most influential critic and the founder of technical publisher O'Reilly & Associates, helped form a service that offers rewards for evidence that a patented technology had been used prior to the date the company filed its patent.

The Symantec patents are for Multi-tiered Incremental Software Updating and Backtracked Incremental Updating.

According to the company, the ability to update virus definitions and software a piece at a time can result in smaller downloads -- sometimes up to 90 percent smaller. That means the company's LiveUpdate software can run up to four times faster than if it had to download the full virus definition.

Symantec is not only attempting to apply the patents to the antivirus industry but also to the software industry as a whole. In its statement Wednesday, the company noted that "the technology may be used to update general computer readable files, which may include data files, program files, database files, graphics files, or audio files".

Yet incremental updates have been around for a long time, most likely for longer than the Internet has been around.

Software companies that need to fix buggy applications would rather not force people to download an entire new program. They'd rather enable customers to download a small update.

Nachenberg said such software updating is old hat, but the way Symantec does its updates is different.

"If you think about virus definitions, they are an entirely different problem [than software]," he said, adding that the major difficulty is that virus definitions change so often. The company's logging of new viruses can easily lead to a new update every day. "I have to be able to patch from any of what could be 365 [definition] updates in a year."

At least one competitor in the antivirus industry said Symantec's new patents were not a worry.

"We do incremental updates -- we've been doing it for a long time," said David Perry, global director of education for antivirus company Trend Micro. "We have our own technology, so we are covered."

How can you protect your PC from viruses? Find out at the Virus Workshop

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the ZDNet News forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
72 out of 130 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:









Related Jobs

3rd Line Engineer- CIVIL SERVICE CO. Central London (32,000k)

Support Analyst with excellent experience in Windows 2003 Server/XP & McAfee Anti Virus required! Windows, ITIL experience required! I have a ...

Systems Engineer - Microsoft

The right candidate will also have skills in security and backup: Veritas Netbackup 6.0 and Symantec Antivirus. Microsoft System Administrator ...

Storage Consultant - Veritas Legato Commvault Enterprise Vault EMC x4

Storage Consultant - Senior Engineer Trainee Consultant - Backup / SAN - Veritas / Symantec Backup Exec, Netbackup, Legato Networker, Commvault ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation