ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Code breakers secrets revealed

Will Knight ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 02 Oct 2000 15:11 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The British secret service is set to release reports about the types of computers used to break Nazi encryption during the Second World War, which are expected to rewrite the timeline of modern computing.

GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters), the modern headquarters for covert information gathering and processing in Britain, will release the 55-year-old classified documents to the public records office later this month.

The documents will show that a machine known as "Colossus II", with basic programmable capabilities, was being used at British code-breaking headquarters, Station X in Bletchley Park, to decrypt high-level tactical communications encrypted using the Lorenz code. By the end of the war ten such machines were being used to attack German messages. This programability represented a fundamental advance in machine computing.

The primitive Colossus computers were used to discover the configurations used to encrypt messages with smaller portable encryption devices.

The new documents will force historians to rethink the date at which the first electronic digital computer was used. A conventional view of history might suggest that the first "programmable" computer device was not used until 1946, but the Colossus machines are dated from two years earlier.

It has been suggested by some historians that the efforts of the Bletchley Park cryptographers, breaking Lorenz and the Enigma code, may have helped shorten the war by several years.

Take me to the Hackers News Special

To have your say online click on the TalkBack button and go to the ZDNet News forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read what others have said.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
18 out of 79 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:










Related Jobs

Executive PA, DV Cleared

You will provide high level administrative support to the Board Director, including understanding and control of sensitive documents and information. ...

Principal Medical Writer, Boutique Medical Communications 50-60k

Writer will provide high level scientific consultancy, lead the strategic and editorial development and co-ordinate implementation of client ...

French, German, Spanish Speaking 1st Line Support Analyst - 25k

French / German / Spanish Speaking 1st Line Support Analyst required. Applicants will possess relevant experience with the following essential ...

Sentry Posts Blog

www.globlefashion.com Tiffany wholesal...

www.globlefashion.com Tiffany wholesale, wholesale Tiffany, bvlgari jewelry www.globlefashion.com,Tiffany jewelry,Gucci jewelry,Tiffany&co www.globlefashion.com ,18K GOLD Tiffany... More

5 comments

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Google sponsors open source security p...

Google has announced it is to sponsor oCERT, an open source computer emergency response team. In a blog post on Monday, Google security engineer Will Drewry said that one of the... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation