ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Enigma code machine swiped from Bletchley Park museum

Will Knight ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 03 Apr 2000 12:07 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

One of only three existing Enigma machines -- used by the Nazis to encrypt messages during the second world war -- has been stolen from the code-breaking museum at Bletchley Park in Buckinghamshire.

Bletchley Park was the location of Station X, the secret base at which Britain's top cryptanalysts broke the fiendishly complicated Enigma code used by the Germans to transmit war-time communications.

Identical Enigma machines, resembling typewriters, were used to encrypt and then decrypt Nazi communications and was for years considered unbreakable by Germany.

British mathematician Alan Turing was the principle code breaker at Bletchley who developed his own machines dubbed "Bombes" capable of deciphering the Enigma code. He contributed to the development of modern computational theory and technology.

The stolen machine was brought to the Bletchley museum following the war and is believed to be worth around £100,000.

In a statement, director of the Bletchley Park Trust Christine Large commented, "This is a selfish act, calculated to deprive the visitors and students at Bletchley Park of the chance to enjoy and appreciate a unique piece of history."

Although security has now been upgraded at the museum, Large added, "The Trust will be deeply grateful for any information that may lead to the return of the machine."

Security firm Polaris Telemetry has agreed to sponsor the installation of a new high-tech surveillance system at the museum.

Bletchley Park Telephone number is 01908 640404

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
45 out of 72 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:















Related Jobs

PC Support Engineer

The PC Support Engineer is responsible for the provision and support of desktop computing facilities including the set up and relocation of desktop ...

Senior Analysts CVM East Midlands 30-35K+benefits

If you have a good understanding of credit card and consumer finance industries as well as a career history using marketing techniques, meeting tight ...

249098HD Service Delivery Manager Bishopsgate, London

Very strong influencing, problem solving and negotiation skills DESIRABLE - Data-mining (route cause analysis) - Analysis PERSONAL QUALITIES - ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation