Advertisement
Promo

Security threats Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;214682528;14505427;f?http://uk.blackberry.com/ataglance/security/

Government snooping will cost taxpayers millions

Will Knight ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 01 Mar 2000 17:09 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Government snooping plans will cost the taxpayer "hundreds of millions" of pounds, according to a report published on Monday.

Under powers proposed in the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) bill -- currently going through Parliament -- law enforcers can seize encryption keys from anyone suspected of criminal activity. Failure to hand over such keys could result in a two-year prison sentence.

The report -- commissioned by the Foundation for Information Policy Research (FIPR) and written by encryption expert Dr Brian Gladman -- claims the government has woefully miscalculated the cost and complexity of safe-guarding public encryption keys.

According to Gladman, the government hasn't planned where it will keep seized keys, which will leave individual's encryption keys vulnerable to theft and misuse, and also present a huge bill to taxpayers. "It will be measured in hundreds of millions of pounds," he warns.

"The government knows the importance of protecting keys, and yet it has chosen to keep Parliament in the dark," he says. "It is hard not to conclude that this is a desperate attempt to prevent an unworkable policy from collapsing under the weight of its own incompetence."

The Home Office rejects the questions raised by the report, asserting that the potential security risks and costs have been exaggerated. "We would dismiss this," a spokesman says. "In cases that do require a key, this would be offered the highest level of protection. We would also dismiss the claims about the costs." He could offer no details on how the government intends to store keys and how much this will cost.

Civil liberty experts remain appalled by the bill. The director of FIPR, Caspar Bowden, thinks the government has not done its homework. "Either the Home Office has completely overlooked the issue of technical security for keys seized by a multitude of public authorities, or Parliament is being hopelessly misled about the costs of implementation," he says.

Solicitor Nicholas Bohm believes the system threatens privacy and security. "The government evidently thinks that it will be satisfactory for anyone with a seized key -- from a policeman to a trading standards officer -- to lock a floppy disk away in the top drawer of their desk," he says.

What do you think? Tell the Mailroom and read what others have to say.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
41 out of 79 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:













Video icon

Video

Sentry Posts Blog

Nasa hacker petition presented to Numb...

Sting's wife Trudie Styler and Janis Sharp have presented a petition to Number 10 calling for Nasa hacker Gary McKinnon not to be extradited to the US. Styler, and Sharp, who is... More

Post a comment

UK to appoint cyber-sec tsar?

The UK is to appoint a cyber security tsar along the lines of the US, according to a story in the Telegraph this morning. The story is similar to one that appeared in the Guardian... More

Post a comment

Nokia Siemens denies Iran web snoop

Nokia Siemens has denied providing deep packet inspection capabilities to the Iranian authorities, following an article in the Wall Street Journal on Monday. The WSJ published the... More

Post a comment


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters