ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Windows security hole and fix explained

Dave Wilby ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 09 Sep 1999 17:15 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Another software patch has been released by the Microsoft camp, this time for a glitch in the TCP/IP stack implementation of Windows 95 and 98.

The problem is caused by fragmented IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol) packets, which can cause problems with the operating systems, up to and including a full machine crash.

IGMP is one of the protocols in the TCP/IP protocol suite, and is used to allow IP multicasting, in which data is sent to a single IP address but may reach multiple hosts.

The vulnerability can leave Windows users open to denial of service attacks. The effect of an attack can vary widely depending upon system loading and other factors, Microsoft said, but could result in minor slowdowns in system performance, loss of some networking functionality or a system crash.

In some cases, users could be protected from malicious attacks by some firewalls, desktop security, or, bizarrely, something as simple as a slow network connection that could give an affected machine time to recover from such an attack.

Windows NT 4.0 is also vulnerable, but includes additional system mechanisms that reduce susceptibility, although Microsoft believes that no Windows NT machines have been affected as yet, and indeed wouldn't succumb to attack under the company's own testing.

Microsoft failed to comment on the security hole, or the patch supplied to fix it.

Patches for Windows 98 and NT 4.0 are already available for download, with full support from Microsoft.

A patch for Windows 95 is promised before the end of the week.

Have you been affected by this security hole? Have you downloaded a patch just in case?

Tell the mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
54 out of 122 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:













Related Jobs

Customer Solutions Engineer / Software Engineer - HTTP, HTML, XML, DNS and TCP/IP,C++, Java, PHP or Python - London, South East

Customer Solutions Engineer / Software Engineer - HTTP, HTML, XML, DNS and TCP/IP,C++, Java, PHP or Python - London, South East The area: Customer ...

Junior Support Engineer AD, Exchange, TCP/IP, DNS, MCP, Kent 25k

Junior Support Engineer AD, Exchange, TCP/IP, DNS, MCP, Kent My client is currently recruiting for a Technical Support Specialist to be based out of ...

Technical Solutions Engineer (Product Specialist Engineer) - C/C++, Java, JavaScript, PHP, Python, and/or Perl, HTML, XML/XSLT, HTTP, SSL, TCP/IP, LINUX / UNIX - London, South East

Technical Solutions Engineer (Product Specialist Engineer) - C/C++, Java, JavaScript, PHP, Python, and/or Perl, HTML, XML/XSLT, HTTP, SSL, TCP/IP, ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation