Advertisement
Promo

Security threats Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;214682528;14505427;f?http://uk.blackberry.com/ataglance/security/

The slow poison of OneCare

Leader ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 16 Mar 2007 17:13 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment
The slow poison of OneCare

A week ago, we reported that Microsoft's OneCare Live security package had failed in a fundamental and exceptionally worrying fashion. In our opinion, it could no longer be considered fit for use — at least, pending an explanation from the company.

Now we have one. In an interview at CeBIT, Microsoft's European business security product manager told us that "bits and pieces are missing" and that it shouldn't have been rolled out when it was. The problems — including basic incompatibilities with other Microsoft products — "are being fixed". That's the wrong tense for a security product that's on the market, especially one in its fifth revision. Perhaps the problems are being fixed, but all the signs are that OneCare is a project in massive internal disarray; misbegotten, mismanaged and mismarketed.

Let's look back at what Microsoft said in 2003, when it bought the core technology behind OneCare. "Customers told us they needed a safer, more trustworthy computing experience to help combat the threats posed by those who write viruses and malicious code," said Mike Nash, corporate vice president of the Security Business Unit at Microsoft. Indeed so.

Trust and responsibility are key here. If in nearly four years Microsoft has failed to create a reliable product, it is irresponsible for it to market the result as the safer, more trustworthy package promised. By the company's own admission, OneCare is fundamentally untrustworthy. Continued efforts to foist it off on customers go beyond incompetence. OneCare is an insult, and the longer it stays on the market the stronger that insult gets.

Microsoft must withdraw the software immediately. It is poisoning any message the company has about being more responsible about security, listening to customers and being a trustworthy partner. It stands as evidence of incompetence and inability to innovate, of a cynical attitude to the market, of all the attributes Microsoft's competition — and, increasingly, its customers — associate with the brand.

This poison will touch everything Microsoft does, from the rest of the Live branded offerings to the core operating system and application products. For if the company doesn't care about its customers in one area, it cannot be expected to do so in any area.

If the company cannot operate with trust and responsibility then ultimately it cannot survive.

 

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
48 out of 59 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. What if... Arthur B.

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Video icon

Video

Sentry Posts Blog

Nasa hacker petition presented to Numb...

Sting's wife Trudie Styler and Janis Sharp have presented a petition to Number 10 calling for Nasa hacker Gary McKinnon not to be extradited to the US. Styler, and Sharp, who is... More

Post a comment

UK to appoint cyber-sec tsar?

The UK is to appoint a cyber security tsar along the lines of the US, according to a story in the Telegraph this morning. The story is similar to one that appeared in the Guardian... More

Post a comment

Nokia Siemens denies Iran web snoop

Nokia Siemens has denied providing deep packet inspection capabilities to the Iranian authorities, following an article in the Wall Street Journal on Monday. The WSJ published the... More

Post a comment


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters