Trust no one, especially Microsoft
Published: 14 Jun 2006 17:00 BST
Microsoft is on shaky ground when it comes to trust. United States and European legislators have already hung the software giant by its heels for practices that are conspicuously "antitrust". So the news this week that Microsoft has once again tap-danced on the face of dependability by pushing out unfinished code to customers isn't exactly surprising.
The already controversial Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) programme — where users authenticate their copy of Windows in order to receive the latest patches and software add-ons — has repeatedly shown itself to be more insidious than previously thought.
Launched in September 2004, WGA asks people to validate their Windows installation when they download additional Microsoft software online. The system checks to see if your version of Windows is activated properly. If not, it assumes that you could be using a pirated version of the OS and blocks you from accessing certain Microsoft services.
The accuracy of this system has already come under fire for limiting access to key updates for those users who don't want the hassle of complying with WGA. Microsoft insists that this is not the case, and that all customers will continue to have access to critical updates. However, this is where semantics comes in — it seems the software giant has a different take on "critical" to the rest of the industry.
It has emerged that a key part of a new addition to the WGA programme — WGA Notifications, which validates the authenticity of Windows software installed on a PC — is not finished code. What is more, WGA Notifications is being punted out as a "high priority" update, effectively forcing users to install on their machines code that is still being developed.
Complexities aside, the bottom line is that Microsoft is messing with the two things it cannot afford to mess with — security and trust. It has an implicit duty to make patching and software updates as easy and obvious as possible for users, but has instead opted to subvert a fundamental process in its quest to bolster licensing revenues.
At the company's annual Tech Ed conference this week, the company was keen to bang the drum about bringing more third-party developers on board and developing community around its products. But the attitude displayed over the WGA programme shows that Redmond needs an urgent information update of its own when it comes to engendering trust in its user base.
Did you find this article useful?
22 out of 41 people found this useful
- Share this article:
Full Talkback thread
3 comments
-
Actions speak louder then words. Arthur B. -
I would just like to point out that Microsoft's WG... Richard Pettigrew
-
Come on, how long before Microsoft makes WGA a "cr... Jamie Dowling
