ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Stealing our NHTCU is a felony

Leader ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 03 Apr 2006 15:15 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

It's official. The National Hi-Tech Crime Unit (NHTCU) no longer exists. The UK organisation that specialised in hunting down and preventing cybercrime has been subsumed into the newly created Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA).

While we welcome the implication that the government now believes IT-related crime to be serious, the fact that there is no longer an agency with "Hi-Tech" in its title is a step backwards in many ways.

The Prime Minister claims that SOCA will help to combat gangsters, drug barons and people-traffickers, but security experts have already told us that its creation will hamper attempts to stop cybercrime.

Not that the NHTCU has received the attention or funding it deserved. At the launch of a recent CBI report into online security, Microsoft's outspoken chief security officer Ed Gibson voiced strong concerns about the NHTCU, claiming that the organisation had been chronically under-funded from the outset.

More worryingly, as Gibson pointed out, the mechanisms for reporting IT related crimes were convoluted and ineffective — even with the NHTCU in place. "I bet if I asked anyone in this room, 'who would you report an electronic crime to in the Police?' no one would know," he said.

As a former FBI agent himself, Gibson is well qualified to comment on the creation of an FBI style agency in the UK. He believes that SOCA would make it even harder for businesses to know who to report technology crimes to, and will exacerbate what he perceives as a "real lack of meaningful statistics" around high-tech crime.

Creating an integrated body that pulls together powers from a variety of agencies does make some sense. Organised crime syndicates, like legitimate organisations, use technology as a tool rather than an end in itself. But given the worrying increase in technology-related crimes, we hope that the creation of SOCA isn't simple an excuse to realise cost savings by consolidating a multitude of expensive individual organisations.

The increasing technical sophistication of criminal gangs demands that the police and other agencies invest the money and resources in keeping pace. The government may claim that the synergies that can be realised by creating SOCA will outweigh the loss of focus on technology crime that will inevitably follow the loss of the NHTCU. We remain to be convinced.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
16 out of 34 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

Are you a Recruitment Officer or Consultant looking for a challenge?

Manage day to day relationships with recruitment agencies/third parties Produce weekly recruitment statistics and MI Ongoing development of the ...

Service Desk Support / Support Technician - Frankfurt, Germany

Provide regular statistics to the management team regarding level of service. Role: Service Desk Support / Support Technician - Frankfurt, Germany ...

RECRUITMENT CO-ORDINATOR REQUIRED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MIDDLESEX

Responsibilities include: Source candidates through various channels Log and track each application accurately Initial CV assessment and screening ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation