ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Electronic crime needs its own force

Leader ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 20 Jan 2005 13:25 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Police launching a series of seminars on preventing electronic crime is a welcome move. The £500 attendance fee is less welcome: surely the police are already being paid to stop crime.

As it turns out, the seminars are being run by a private company on behalf of the Metropolitan Police, hence the charge. You can hardly blame Scotland Yard for outsourcing this particular requirement -- its Computer Crime Unit has just nine officers, so can hardly spare a couple to run courses for a few days.

While you could argue that businesses should pay for the advice they get, this still looks like a classic case of underfunding. Indeed, one group of lobbyists, the European Information Society Group (EURIM), is pushing for more funding to be made available for the fight against electronic crime. More money is needed, but it will be wasted without reforms elsewhere.

The National Hi-Tech Crime Unit was launched in 2001 with the aim of being a central body for fighting electronic crimes, with £25m funding over three years. Those three years has now passed, and while there has been a respectable level of success in detection and prevention, even the Home Office has admitted more needs to be done.

The problem lies in the lack of coordination. Despite the formation of the NHTCU, there are still many bodies in the UK with responsibility for detecting and preventing electronic crime: as well as the NHTCU there are local police forces, the Internet Watch Foundation, and the Information Commissioner. That doesn't even take into account the use of new technologies to commit old crimes: from fraud to forgery, every part of policing must be able to respond effectively.

The problem for the victim of an electronic crime is which of these bodies to report the crime to. For minor crimes, your local police force may be the right people, but if the problem is too technical they probably won't have the expertise or resources to deal with it. What's worse, lack of training means the local bobbies may not know what to do with your report. Equally, the NHTCU won't realistically be able to deal with every small incident that's reported to it without a far greater number of staff.

We need a single cohesive policy for dealing with electronic crime, and a single point of responsibility to make it happen. IT and telecommunications can be a great force for good, both in business and society, but it can only do this if the electronic world is policed as effectively as the physical world.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
31 out of 59 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:








Related Jobs

Capgemini - Careers in Consulting, Technology and Outsourcing

You can expect challenge and variety when you find yourself at the centre of transformation projects for clients like HMRC, the Metropolitan Police, ...

URGENT! ASP.Net / VB application developer required in Bristol

The vast majority of their business is for the UK police forces. That means you will have to under go police vetting to work for this company. Huxley ...

Web Developer

Position: .Net Web Developer Skills: ASP.Net, SQL Server/T-SQL, XML SALARY: 37k - 45k + excellent public sector benefits LOCATION: Southend ASP.Net ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation