Advertisement
Promo

Security management Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;214682528;14505427;f?http://uk.blackberry.com/ataglance/security/

Tories liable to compensate ID scheme vendors

Kablenet.com

Published: 29 May 2008 08:48 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A Conservative government would have to compensate suppliers of the National Identity Scheme for lost profits as well as costs if it cancelled the project.

"To guarantee these payments knowing that a future Conservative government has already said it will scrap ID cards is improper and quite extraordinary," shadow home secretary David Davis told the Financial Times on 24 May, 2008, citing the convention that one Parliament may not bind a subsequent one.

Davis wrote to the potential suppliers of the scheme in February, giving formal notice that the Tories would cancel the scheme if elected.

The Home Office told GC News that the contracts include break clauses, which if exercised would mean the government paying costs and an element of lost profits. "It's based on how far the contract has got and various other factors," a spokesperson said, adding that these were standard contractual arrangements following Office of Government Commerce guidelines.

IT community hero
Who's your IT Community Hero?

Tell us who has done the most to make the lives and jobs of people in IT easier by fostering a sense of community

Read more+

The spokesperson added that "nothing has been created bespoke" to deal with the Conservatives' intentions, and that the figures involved in cancellation are commercially confidential.

The Identity and Passport Service outlined the contracts to build the scheme, which is dominated by three major contracts each worth around £500m, on 23 May. Only the deal to produce identity cards, due to be announced in summer 2009, would be at risk of complete cancellation in the event of the Conservatives gaining power.

The other two, for passport applications and for a biometric database, both due to be awarded early next year, would be reduced in volume and scope if the scheme was scrapped, although both would be required to produce passports containing applicants' fingerprints. These reductions would also trigger compensation payments for vendors, although smaller than those for total cancellation of a contract.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
5 out of 5 people found this useful


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Video icon

Video

Sentry Posts Blog

Met will not reopen phone hack investi...

The Metropolitan Police will not reopen its investigation into alleged phone hacking by the News of the World. In a press statement delivered outside Scotland Yard on Thursday, Assistant... More

Post a comment

FUD over ChromeOS's security already?

It hasn't taken long for the security vendors to wake to the potential of Google's new ChromeOS. The potential that is, to create FUD – fear uncertainty and doubt. In a release today,... More

Post a comment

Feds take DDoS in their stride

The US Department of Homeland Security has said that a series of distributed denial-of-service attacks began on US government networks on 4 July. However, Amy Kudwa, deputy press... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

It seems to me this is a burden being placed on the wrong shoulders. There is not an It system in the world that can stop an individual taking information in their heads and spewing out at the nearest undesirable third party.

By: RonaldWilkins

Read full story:
Deloitte: People are still weakest security link


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters