Advertisement
Promo

Security management Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;214682528;14505427;f?http://uk.blackberry.com/ataglance/security/

Judge rules against release of ID card review

Nick Heath silicon.com

Published: 15 Apr 2008 08:31 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The High Court has quashed a ruling that a review of the ID card scheme should be published.

Judge Stanley Burnton overturned the decision by the Information Tribunal that the ID card gateway reviews should be published.

A new hearing of the Information Tribunal will now decide whether they should be published.

The High Court decision means further delay while the Information Tribunal makes a new decision on publication of the reviews and the possibility of further setbacks if this new decision is again challenged.

The matter was sent to the High Court after the Office of Government Commerce appealed a decision by the tribunal to uphold a decision by the Information Commissioner to require the reviews were disclosed to activist Mark Dziecielewski and MP Mark Oaten.

Read this

Feature
Corporate espionage: Not if, but when

When it comes to business-to-business theft of information, experts agree — it's best to assume it will happen to your company

Read more +

Reacting to the High Court's decision, a spokesman for the Information Commissioner's Office told ZDNet.co.uk's sister site, silicon.com: "In the Information Commissioner's view the public interest in disclosing this information is greater than the arguments put forward for keeping the information secret.

"In his view disclosure is likely to enhance public debate of issues such as the programme's feasibility and how it is managed."

Ruling against the tribunal's decision, the judge found that it had relied on the findings of a report on the confidentiality of gateway reviews by a parliamentary select committee on Work and Pensions.

Burnton said this put the tribunal and judiciary at risk of breaching the ancient right of parliamentary privilege that forbids courts from passing judgement on parliamentary decisions.

In the ruling, Burnton said: "In relying on the opinion of the select committee the tribunal took into account an illegitimate and irrelevant matter, and for this reason alone the first decision, and in consequence the second decision, must be quashed."

Credit: Secret ID card review: Judge quashes its release from silicon.com

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
5 out of 5 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Video icon

Video

Sentry Posts Blog

Met will not reopen phone hack investi...

The Metropolitan Police will not reopen its investigation into alleged phone hacking by the News of the World. In a press statement delivered outside Scotland Yard on Thursday, Assistant... More

Post a comment

FUD over ChromeOS's security already?

It hasn't taken long for the security vendors to wake to the potential of Google's new ChromeOS. The potential that is, to create FUD – fear uncertainty and doubt. In a release today,... More

Post a comment

Feds take DDoS in their stride

The US Department of Homeland Security has said that a series of distributed denial-of-service attacks began on US government networks on 4 July. However, Amy Kudwa, deputy press... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

It seems to me this is a burden being placed on the wrong shoulders. There is not an It system in the world that can stop an individual taking information in their heads and spewing out at the nearest undesirable third party.

By: RonaldWilkins

Read full story:
Deloitte: People are still weakest security link


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters