ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Outsourcing Toolkit

Doctors losing faith in NHS IT

Kablenet.com

Published: 26 Nov 2007 16:08 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The latest Medix survey shows that doctors' support for the NHS's National Programme for IT is falling, despite a general enthusiasm for new IT.

Doctors' support for the National Programme for IT (NPfIT) is waning and they are becoming increasingly critical of the five-year-old scheme, according to a report by research company Medix.

Whereas Medix research in early 2004 showed that 56 percent of GPs and 75 percent of other doctors were enthusiastic about NPfIT, the latest findings show this has dropped to 23 percent of GPs and 35 percent of other doctors.

In 2003, 47 percent of all respondents thought NPfIT was a good use of NHS resources and 27 percent judged it a poor use, but, according to the most recent research, those figures have changed to eight percent and 70 percent respectively.

"When NPfIT was launched, most doctors... were pleased that the government had decided to allocate substantial funds to a radical update of NHS IT systems," stated Medix's report. "Today, five years later, doctors still support the principles of the project, but most are critical of its costs and believe it is being poorly implemented."

The latest research, carried out in October and November of this year, produced four other key findings:

  • Only eight percent of the more than 1,000 doctors who responded said that information about NPfIT received from the Department of Health was reliable and accurate
  • More than half (52 percent) did not understand, or had never heard of, the Summary Care Record
  • Seventy-four percent of respondents said they did not feel engaged with the programme, compared with only two percent who said they felt very engaged
  • Most doctors (76 percent) agreed that an independent review of the programme was important

Choose and Book was perceived as a particular problem area. Although 49 percent of GPs said they use Choose and Book for more than 40 percent of referrals, most of those (90 percent) said that it increased the time taken to make referrals.

Read this

Feature
Feature: The top 10 IT disasters of all time

From faulty satellites nearly causing World War III to the Millennium Bug, poorly executed IT has had a lot to answer for over the years...

Read more +

More positively, the survey found that most doctors recognised the benefits of the national programme. For example, 55 percent said they thought it will improve clinical care in the long term, and 47 percent agreed that the e-patient record system will enable clinicians to make better decisions.

A spokesperson for Connecting for Health, the agency responsible for NPfIT, said on Friday: "We would view these results in light of what patients tell us, for example, on the positive contribution Choose and Book has made to patient referral times, and the early signs from those areas introducing the Summary Care Record about the improvement this will make to patient safety."

"In the light of all of this wider experience and evidence, the results of the Medix survey do not appear to reflect the general picture on the ground, or chime with other recent comprehensive surveys," the spokesperson added.

The spokesperson said that Connecting for Health is engaged in consultations with a wide range of clinicians about all elements of the NPfIT and that, last Thursday, 200 clinicians gathered in London to meet with the programme's senior management.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
9 out of 9 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

NHS Project Manager Summary Care Records

My client urgently seeks an NHS Project Manager to initiate the delivery of the Summary Care Records (SCR) as part of the National Programme for IT ...

Head of Information

Demonstrate credibility with senior managers and clinicians across the health community - Ability to identify sources of NHS activity and financial ...

Head of Informatics

Suffolk Support Services, with its host organisation Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, provides financial, IT, payroll, ...

Discussions

319762 319762

Eve of Distraction

Saturday 26 July 2008, 4:37 AM

1 comment

Featured Talkback

Software development for instance can be off shored with a perceived reduction in development costs but the resulting code is rarely of good quality and there is much greater expense in reworking and support over the life of software developed in this way. As a consultant who has to deal with off shoring on daily basis I very often see no savings at all over the lifetime of a software product, and in some cases actually see projects costing a fortune to rework.

By: pround

Read full story:
Offshoring behind UK tech-labour divide